A court increasingly becomes a tool for pressure

вестник 02.07.2020

Every 10th case returns to the applicant without consideration. It means that many companies try to recover the claimed amounts through a court, and withdrawn the case as received the money.

Picture 1.

We combined the experience of companies participated in arbitration cases over the past five years. Here are the results of our research.

Main statistics

In 2019, the arbitration courts considered a record 2,1 million cases. The number of them is growing annually, and over the past 5 years it has increased 1,3 times. Companies are increasingly turning to arbitration to resolve economic disputes with counterparties, but upholding their interests in court does not always guarantee satisfaction of claims and repayment of losses.

Most often, counterparties sue directly among themselves (61%). Economic disputes with administrative authorities account for just over a third of arbitration cases (32%). The share of bankruptcy cases is 7%.

Picture 2.

Only one third of the amount of claims is recoverable

The total amount of claims filed by the court in 2019 amounted to 5,7 trillion RUB. Of these, the court decided to recover only 31% of the initial amount of claims, which amounted to 1,8 trillion RUB. The percentage of satisfied claims is reduced annually: 5 years ago, 46% of the claimed claims were recovered.

Picture 3.

Non-fulfillment of the sale and purchase agreement is the most frequent dispute between counterparties in Russia

In 2019, the courts examined 514 thousand cases of non-fulfillment of sale and purchase agreements at the amount of 2,378 billion RUB. Of these, the court decided to recover less than a quarter: 550 billion RUB or 23% of the initial claims on debtors.

Picture 4.
The most frequently acts as defendant   The most frequently acts as claimant
ОАО РЖД   PJSC Rostelecom
12 104 cases in 2019   11 118 cases in 2019

How to minimize the risks

The resolution of economic disputes in an arbitration court is a traditional and generally accepted way, but it does not always lead to a positive result, since the probability of full judicial compensation for losses is very small. The most effective way to avoid losses and minimize the likelihood of breach of contractual obligations is to carefully check and select reliable counterparties using a professional information system.