Information agency Credinform has prepared a ranking of the largest Russian enterprises for passenger transportation. The TOP-10 companies with the highest volume of revenue were selected for the ranking, according to the data from the Statistical Register for the latest available accounting periods (2015 and 2014). Enterprises of the rating are ranked by return on assets (Table 1).
Return on assets ratio (%) is calculated as the relation of the sum of net profit and interest payable to the total assets value and shows how many monetary units of net profit gets every unit of total assets. The ratio characterizes the effectiveness of using of all available resources and financial management. The higher is the ratio value, the more effective is business, that is higher return per every invested in assets monetary unit.
However, it should be considered that book value of assets cannot correspond to its current market price to a great extent. For example, under inflation the book value of fixed assets with a course of time will be more and more underestimated, that leads to overestimation of return on assets. In other words, it is necessary to pay attention not only to the assets structure but also to its maturity.
Dynamics of this indicator also should be considered. The subsequent decrease demonstrates decline of effectiveness in the assets use.
Name | Net profit (loss) of 2015, mln RUB | Revenue of 2015, mln RUB | Revenue of 2015 to 2014, +/- % | Return on assets, % | Solvency index Globas-i® |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSC ORENBURG AIRLINES INN 5638057840 Orenburg region |
506,4 | 22 765,9 | 17 | 6,16 | 282 High |
JSC SIBERIA AIRLINES INN 5448100656 Novosibirsk region |
922,9 | 82 214,5 | 16 | 3,04 | 282 Highest |
JSC RUSSIAN RAILWAYS INN 7708503727 Moscow |
318,0 | 1 510 757,0 | 8 | 0,01 | 227 High |
SUE MOSCOW METRO NAMED AFTER V.I.LENIN INN 7702038150 Moscow |
-505,2 | 87 471,0 | 4 | -0,03 | 249 High |
SUE SAINT-PETERSBURG METRO INN 7830000970 Saint-Petersburg |
-270,1 | 18 831,6 | 8 | -0,35 | 234 High |
LLC NORD WIND INN 7733646084 Moscow |
-270,8 | 26 867,4 | -34 | -4,71 | 309 Satisfactory |
SUE MOSGORTRANS INN 7705002602 Moscow |
-5 577,6 | 41 534,2 | 3 | -7,08 | 247 High |
JSC AEROFLOT-RUSSIAN AIRLINES INN 7712040126 г. Москва |
-18 927,8 | 366 307,5 | 52 | -10,15 | 176 Highest |
LLC GAZPROMAVIA AVIATION COMPANY INN 7736046504 Moscow |
-4 652,5 | 16 164,8 | 2 | -12,00 | 258 High |
JSC TRANSAERO AIRLINES INN 5701000985 Saint-Petersburg |
-98 932,7 | 97 711,1 | -17 | -118,86 | 450 Low |
Total for TOP-10 companies (* - average value for the group) |
-127 389,6 | 2 270 625,0 | *11 | *-14.40 | |
Total for TOP-100 companies (*- average value for the group) |
-128 780,6 | 2 447 090,6 | *12 | *-4,97 |
Average values of return on assets in 2015 are negative both in the TOP-10 and in the TOP-100 groups.
Industry average values of return on assets are shown in the Table 2.
Type of passenger transport | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
---|---|---|---|
Maritime | -2,49 | -7,15 | 3,96 |
Railway in suburban traffic | н/д | 0,23 | 1,14 |
Railway backbone | 0,55 | -0,71 | 0,33 |
Underground | н/д | 0,21 | -0,12 |
Taxi | -10,38 | 34,05 | -0,30 |
Inland water | 6,77 | -3,96 | -6,39 |
Bus | -4,62 | -5,91 | -6,99 |
Tramway | -1,86 | -14,15 | -8,96 |
Trolley bus | -6,55 | -4,03 | -15,36 |
Air | -3,12 | -12,10 | -31,02 |
Only three companies out of TOP-10 have got positive values of return on assets.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1924/f19240f5f7c01bd145eada87c9a85ad95cb29904" alt="Return on assets and revenue of the largest Russian enterprises for passenger transportations (TOP-10)"
Revenue volume of the 10 largest companies is 93% of total revenue of the 100 largest companies. It shows high level of monopolization, first of all, in the area of railway passenger transportations, because share of the largest company, according to the revenue volume in 2015 - JSC RUSSIAN RAILWAYS is almost 67% of total revenue of the TOP-10 group. Besides, enterprises for bus passenger transportations have got the biggest share in the total revenue of TOP-100 companies (Picture 2).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/806d8/806d8736f46caf093b61403bd6d43ebd4061cfa5" alt="Share of TOP-100 companies` total revenue in 2015 in terms of passenger transportation type, %"
Eight out of TOP-10 companies have got the highest or high solvency index Globas-i®, that demonstrates the ability to pay the debts in time and to the full extent.
LLC NORD WIND has got satisfactory solvency index Globas-i® because of the information about the participation as a defendant in arbitration court proceedings in terms of debt collection, unclosed enforcement orders and loss in the balance sheets. Projected growth of the index is stable.
JSC TRANSAERO AIRLINES has got low solvency index Globas-i® due to the information about claim for recognition of the company bankrupt, listing in the blacklist of suppliers, unclosed enforcement orders and loss in the balance sheets. Projected growth of the index is negative.
Seven out of TOP-10 companies decreased indicators of revenue compared to the previous period or have loss in 2015 (marked with red shading in Table 1).
In the TOP-100 group 53 lossmaking companies were observed in 2014, and in 2015 the amount insignificantly decreased to 52.
In general, monetary indicators of passenger transportations in 2016 have grown compared to 2010 (except for taxi transportations), that is confirmed by data from the Federal State Statistics Service (Table 3).
Type of passenger transportation | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2016 to 2010, % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scheduled air transport | 383 468 090 | 462 801 843 | 555 009 646 | 647 696 800 | 647 734 812 | 800 879 312 | 943 788 636 | 146 |
Other scheduled land transport | 221 218 593 | 243 591 843 | 262 093 658 | 275 516 742 | 299 906 865 | 315 496 370 | 344 539 442 | 56 |
Railway backbone transport | 126 339 471 | 168 499 283 | 225 403 027 | 238 174 601 | 232 785 908 | 231 417 020 | 269 024 137 | 113 |
Urban electric transport | 105 132 380 | 122 574 362 | 134 769 343 | 134 123 195 | 149 231 508 | 160 869 125 | 176 806 915 | 113 |
Automobile (bus) scheduled transport | 115 371 219 | 120 476 784 | 126 953 757 | 138 283 128 | 148 558 682 | 151 403 886 | 152 226 256 | 32 |
Intra-urban automobile (bus) scheduled transportations | 93 011 551 | 97 243 721 | 104 052 116 | 115 099 278 | 126 488 948 | 129 472 148 | 131 675 112 | 42 |
Underground | 71 877 854 | 82 852 474 | 93 357 108 | 92 309 091 | 105 082 890 | 111 479 422 | 131 326 069 | 83 |
Nonscheduled air transport | 21 314 554 | 14 801 226 | 11 563 326 | 18 956 009 | 54 171 380 | 65 995 239 | 46 968 613 | 120 |
Other land transport | 26 105 409 | 25 322 227 | 30 280 212 | 36 059 091 | 47 300 396 | 49 030 510 | 38 541 742 | 48 |
Tramway transportations | 19 250 939 | 20 029 252 | 21 089 025 | 23 249 932 | 23 344 031 | 29 340 618 | 25 717 386 | 34 |
Trolley bus transportations | 13 506 290 | 15 936 329 | 16 696 068 | 15 089 821 | 17 093 400 | 15 716 685 | 15 711 528 | 16 |
Inland water transport | 1 539 154 | 4 211 332 | 4 186 707 | 4 722 625 | 3 945 674 | 2 903 341 | 14 440 178 | 838 |
Suburban scheduled automobile (bus) transportations | 10 289 459 | 12 568 305 | 13 333 307 | 13 200 025 | 13 863 063 | 13 205 285 | 11 215 752 | 9 |
Funicular, ropeway and elevator transportations | 199 593 | 198 876 | 362 254 | 663 858 | 1 818 415 | 2 792 303 | 4 606 756 | 2 208 |
Intra-urban and suburban railway transportations | 489 372 | 3 746 914 | 3 578 382 | 3 465 622 | 3 363 348 | 3 703 046 | 4 051 932 | 729 |
Maritime transport | 772 271 | 364 609 | 564 708 | 316 833 | 299 127 | 311 548 | 3 691 043 | 378 |
Taxi | 3 045 371 | 2 930 484 | 2 424 045 | 1 714 089 | 758 524 | 1 251 386 | 933 488 | -69 |
*) In Table 3 decrease of revenue is marked with red shading and growth with green. |
The enterprises for passenger transportation are distributed on the territory of the country equally, attracting to the thickly populated regions because of specific activity. It is confirmed by data from the Information and Analytical system Globas-i®, according to that the 100 largest companies in terms of revenue volume for 2015 are registered in 42 regions of Russia. (Picture 3).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d964/7d96434d95e4ef6eade29a14770043029e13935d" alt="Distribution of the 100 largest Russian companies for passenger transportation according to the regions of Russia"
Information agency Credinform prepared a ranking of Russian leasing companies. The enterprises with the largest volume of revenue (TOP-10) were selected for the ranking, according to the data from the Statistical Register for the latest available periods (for 2014 and 2015). Then they were ranked by accounts payable turnover (Table 1).
Accounts payable turnover (times in a year) is calculated as the relation of average accounts payable for the period to sales revenue. The ratio shows how many times a year an enterprise has discharged the average amount of its accounts payable.
This indicator reflects the process of debt repayment to contractors (partners, suppliers, mediators etc.). The coefficient determines the number of firm's closed debts and is calculated to estimate cash flows. It allows to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of company’s work and chosen financial strategy.
The higher is the ratio value, the soonest an enterprise settles accounts with its suppliers. Reduction of turnover can mean as well problems with payment of invoices, as more effective organization of relationships with suppliers, which provides a more profitable, deferred payment schedule and uses accounts payable as a source of cheap financial resources.
The specialists of the Information agency Credinform, taking into account the actual situation both in the economy as a whole and in the sectors, has developed and implemented in the Information and Analytical system Globas-i the calculation of practical values of financial ratios, which can be recognized as normal for a particular industry. For leasing companies the practical value of the accounts payable turnover is up to 338,29 times.
For getting of the most comprehensive and fair picture of the financial standing of an enterprise it is necessary to pay attention to all available combination of company’s financial indicators and ratios.
Name, INN, region | Net profit (loss) for 2015, mln RUB | Revenue for 2015, mln RUB | Revenue for 2015, by 2014, +/- % | Accounts payable turnover, times in 2015 | Solvency index Globas-i® |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPETSNEFTETRANS LLC INN 7743712642 Moscow |
888,1 | 4 500,3 | 78 | 3 059,19 | 272 High |
PAO ROSAGROLIZING INN 7704221591 Moscow |
-9 679,1 | 3 258,1 | 13 | 847,41 | 228 High |
NITROKHIMPROM LLC INN 7718196987 Moscow |
170,6 | 3 320,6 | 2 138 | 541,80 | 221 High |
RN-AIRCRAFT LLC INN 7706734415 Moscow |
6 540,9 | 8 649,2 | 57 | 110,16 | 242 High |
RAIL1520 LLC INN 7801537819 Leningrad region |
661,2 | 8 172,5 | 116 | 82,90 | 297 High |
NAO PROMTRANSINVEST INN 7730714748 Moscow |
604,4 | 8 189,2 | 220 | 62,21 | 227 High |
TATNEFT – AKTIV LLC INN 1644013875 Republic of Tatarstan |
129,4 | 2 727,1 | 28 | 41,11 | 199 The highest |
BRANSVIK REIL LLC INN 7705872331 Moscow |
-4 435,7 | 7 271,8 | -2 | 35,73 | 307 Satisfactory |
GTI MENEDZHMENT LLC INN 7701409186 Moscow |
591,2 | 3 096,4 | 182 | 35,62 | 266 High |
AGGREKO EURASIA LLC INN 7705838531 Tyumen region |
962,6 | 2 879,3 | 40 | 30,52 | 189 The highest |
Total in the group of TOP-10 companies | -3 566,4 | 52 064,4 | *73 | **219,62 | |
Total in the group of TOP-100 companies | -5 419,1 | 118 128,5 | *38 | **168,67 | |
Industry average value/strong> | -0,6 | 25,7 | -9 | 299,38 | |
* - group average value ** - group average value without extreme values |
The average values of accounts payable turnover in 2015 as well in the group of TOP-10, as in the group TOP-100 companies stay within parameters of the practical value. However, three from TOP-10 companies (marked with a yellow filling in Table 1 and in Picture 1) have not met these parameters.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b78c6/b78c632ef7980f124257031b791eec0fe590cec5" alt="Accounts payable turnover and revenue of the largest Russian leasing companies (TOP-10)"
The volume of revenue of 10 the largest companies is 44% of the total revenue of 100 the largest enterprises. It points to a relatively high level of monopolization in this industry. Thus, the shares of the largest firms in terms of revenue in 2015 made 21% in the total revenue of the group of TOP-100 companies. (Picture 2).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45d75/45d759e260533a75be5b7e9f42249a360cc52530" alt="Shares of TOP-10 enterprises in the total revenue of the group of TOP-100 companies for 2015, %"
Nine from TOP-10 companies got the highest or high solvency index Глобас-i®U, that points to their ability to repay their debts in time and fully.
BRANSVIK REIL LLC got satisfactory solvency index Глобас-i® due to the information on its participation as a defendant in arbitration court proceedings in terms of debt collection, on cases of untimely fulfillment of its obligations, as well as the loss in the structure of balance sheet indicators. The forecast for index development is stable.
Three from TOP-10 companies have reduced indicators of revenue in 2015 compared to the previous period or have a loss (are marked with red filling in Table 1).
In the group of TOP-100 companies there were 27 unprofitable companies in 2014, and in 2015 their number decreased to 25.
The indicators of Russian leasing companies in monetary terms have not been stable in recent years and are under pressure of the macroeconomic situation in the economy as a whole, that is confirmed by the data of the Federal State Statistics Service (Picture 3 и Table 2).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f87dd/f87dd9cd80916ab4fc19b4db3f22193c2483a89e" alt="Growth rates (rates of drawdown) of the total revenue of Russian leasing companies from year to year, %"
In 2016 the largest revenue was by companies, renting various machines and equipment, household products and personal demand items, and the least – by firms, renting commercial equipment.
Leasing of: | 2010 г. | 2011 г. | 2012 г. | 2013 г. | 2014 г. | 2015 г. | 2016 г. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
of machines and equipment without an operator; leasing of household goods and personal demand items | 63 467 670 | 77 222 139 | 88 113 719 | 108 117 783 | 121 148 285 | 103 362 858 | 104 108 554 |
of other machines and equipment | 25 264 865 | 25 433 896 | 47 951 336 | 50 196 942 | 62 816 332 | 32 490 160 | 40 497 161 |
of other vehicles and equipment | 15 706 913 | 25 300 835 | 35 119 421 | 49 848 191 | 49 013 587 | 55 432 777 | 39 723 982 |
of other land vehicles and equipment | 15 043 107 | 24 398 446 | 34 275 436 | 48 822 363 | 47 422 878 | 54 864 194 | 38 113 449 |
of other motor vehicles and equipment | 11 841 822 | 11 196 123 | 16 619 904 | 37 801 692 | 24 444 882 | 16 996 705 | 24 158 204 |
of cars | 21 993 809 | 26 039 448 | 4 420 659 | 7 048 439 | 8 622 268 | 14 728 340 | 23 127 046 |
construction machines and equipment with an operator | 13 125 243 | 12 682 238 | 15 288 568 | 12 835 733 | 13 873 017 | 11 880 186 | 19 554 487 |
construction machines and equipment | 4 367 491 | 5 129 657 | 21 907 065 | 33 184 819 | 45 563 304 | 12 229 349 | 17 663 857 |
of other machines and equipment n.e.c. | 15 719 453 | 16 401 560 | 20 240 909 | 12 335 964 | 12 940 284 | 14 499 193 | 17 462 162 |
of marine vehicles with crew; provision of switching and shunting | 844 300 | 1 909 186 | 2 715 643 | 2 577 702 | 7 779 949 | 9 509 885 | 16 470 901 |
of railway transport and equipment | 3 201 285 | 13 202 323 | 17 655 532 | 11 020 671 | 22 109 752 | 31 719 497 | 13 240 146 |
of other machines and equipment of scientific and industrial purpose | 14 607 391 | 12 256 677 | 13 945 837 | 6 852 309 | 11 276 546 | 11 074 771 | 10 588 322 |
agricultural machinery and equipment | 4 180 878 | 2 884 220 | 4 718 951 | 4 543 027 | 4 224 450 | 5 715 931 | 5 012 810 |
of cargo motor transport with an driver | 2 740 842 | 4 939 978 | 3 949 999 | 3 865 291 | 4 344 440 | 5 416 675 | 4 239 681 |
of air vehicles and equipment | 192 422 | 260 913 | 194 394 | 114 708 | 77 536 | 60 226 | 1 123 294 |
of water vehicles and equipment | 471 384 | 641 476 | 649 591 | 700 782 | 1 297 544 | 186 218 | 487 239 |
of mining and oilfield equipment | 555 962 | 4 137 040 | 6 247 895 | 1 651 801 | 258 833 | 403 6208 | 398 153 |
office machines and equipment, including computing hardware | 997 043 | 1 018 459 | 1 084 411 | 131 762 | 88 294 | 45 687 | 358 332 |
shop equipment | 400 750 | 4 889 | 5 811 | 7 103 | 6 213 | 6 523 | 6 683 |
*) In Table 3 the red filling marks the decline in revenue, green filling – the growth. |
The leasing enterprises are distributed unevenly throughout the country, leaning toward two the biggest cities, where the largest financial resources are concentrated. This is confirmed by data of the Information and Analytical system Глобас-i, according to which 100 the largest companies in terms of revenue for 2015 are registered in 32 regions of Russia (Picture 4).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db928/db928a32cbbb72379ebb4b08f7ae0803a5ecb6e7" alt="Distribution of 100 the largest leasing enterprises by regions of Russia"