Article
Trends in waste disposal

Information agency Credinform has observed trends in the activity of the largest Russian enterprises engaged in collection, processing and disposal of waste. Companies with the largest volume of annual revenue (TOP-10 and TOP-1000), were selected for the analysis, according to the data from the Statistical Register for the latest available periods (for 2015-2017). The analysis was made on the basis of the data of the Information and Analytical system Globas.

Net assets - indicator, reflecting the real value of company's property, is calculated annually as the difference between assets on the enterprise balance and its debt obligations. The indicator of net assets is considered negative (insufficiency of property), if company’s debt exceeds the value of its property.

Table 1. The largest Russian enterprises engaged in collection, processing and disposal of waste with the largest and smallest amount of net assets in 2015 - 2017
№ in TOP-1000,
name, INN, region, main type of activity
Net assets value, mln RUB Solvency index Globas
2015 2016 2017
1 2 3 4 5
1 GUP EKOTEKHPROM
INN 7706043312 Moscow
Waste collection
6383 up6416 up7622 299 Medium
2 JSC WASTE MANAGEMENT
INN 7725727149 Moscow
Processing and disposal of non-hazardous waste
-323 up2650 up3645 269 Medium
3 FEDERAL STATE-OWNED COMPANY GORNIY
INN 6418001160 Saratov region
Waste collection
4011 down3875 down3570 290 Medium
4 SPB GUDP CENTR
INN 7812021254 Saint-Petersburg
Waste collection
2854 down2751 down2723 217 Strong
5 SUE SIA Radon
INN 7704009700 Moscow
Waste collection
3009 up3351 down2317 259 Medium
996 JSC KEK
INN 1655041708 The Republic of Tatarstan
Waste collection
20 up21 down-126 316 Adequate
997 JSC Special Facility for Disposal
INN 2320189736 Krasnodar region
Waste collection
-243 up-242 up-242 293 Medium
998 LLC WASTE DISPOSAL - VOLGOGRAD
INN 3426013572 Volgograd region
Waste collection
-155 down-226 down-303 322 Adequate
999 LLC EVN-Ekotechprom MSZ 3
INN 7737520364 Moscow
Waste collection
22 down-516 down-678 323 Adequate
1000 JSC Concel
INN 7735093237 Moscow
Disposal of sorted waste
-2211 up-2116 down-2123 276 Medium

Up — growth of the indicator to the previous period, Up — decline of the indicator to the previous period.

For ten years average amounts of net assets of TOP-1000 companies have increasing tendency (Picture 1).

Picture 1. Change in TOP-1000 average indicators of the net assets amount of the enterprises engaged in collection, processing and disposal of waste in 2008 – 2017 Picture 1. Change in TOP-1000 average indicators of the net assets amount of the enterprises engaged in collection, processing and disposal of waste in 2008 – 2017

Share of companies with insufficiency of property among TOP-1000 for the last three years tends to increase (Picture 2).

Picture 2. Share of companies with negative value of net assets amount in TOP-1000 in 2015 – 2017 Picture 2. Share of companies with negative value of net assets amount in TOP-1000 in 2015 – 2017

Sales revenue
The revenue of 10 leaders of the industry made 19% of the total revenue of TOP-1000 companies in 2017(Picture 3). It demonstrates relatively high level of competition.

Picture 3. Shares of participation of TOP-10 companies in the total revenue of TOP-1000 companies for 2017 Picture 3. Shares of participation of TOP-10 companies in the total revenue of TOP-1000 companies for 2017

In general, a decrease of indicators of average revenue volume is observed (Picture 4).

Picture 4. Change in the average revenue of the enterprises engaged in collection, processing and disposal of waste in 2008 – 2017 Picture 4. Change in the average revenue of the enterprises engaged in collection, processing and disposal of waste in 2008 – 2017

Profit and losses
The profit volume of 10 leading enterprises in 2017 made 25% of the total profit of TOP-1000 companies (Picture 5).

Picture 5. Share of participation of TOP-10 companies in the total volume of profit of TOP-1000 companies for 2017 Picture 5. Share of participation of TOP-10 companies in the total volume of profit of TOP-1000 companies for 2017

Over a ten-year period, the average values of profit indicators of TOP-1000 companies tend to increase (Picture 6).

Picture 6. Change in the average indicators of net profit of the enterprises engaged in collection, processing and disposal of waste in 2008 – 2017 Picture 6. Change in the average indicators of net profit of the enterprises engaged in collection, processing and disposal of waste in 2008 – 2017

Over the three-year period average values of net profit indicators of TOP-1000 companies have increasing tendency, besides, average amount of net loss is increasing. (Picture 6).

Picture 7. Change in the average indicators of profit and loss of TOP-1000 companies in 2015 – 2017 Picture 7. Change in the average indicators of profit and loss of TOP-1000 companies in 2015 – 2017

Key financial ratios

Over the ten-year period the average indicators of the current liquidity ratio were above the range of recommended values – from 1,0 up to 2,0 with increasing tendency (Picture 8).

The current liquidity ratio (the relation of the amount of current assets to short-term liabilities) shows the sufficiency of company’s funds for repayment of its short-term liabilities.

Picture 8. Change in the industry values of the current liquidity ratio of the enterprises engaged in collection, processing and disposal of waste in 2008 – 2017 Picture 8. Change in the industry values of the current liquidity ratio of the enterprises engaged in collection, processing and disposal of waste in 2008 – 2017

Increasing tendency in the indicators of the return on investments ratio has been observed for ten years. (Picture 9)

The ratio is calculated as the relation of net profit to the sum of own capital and long-term liabilities and demonstrates the return on the equity involved in the commercial activity of own capital and the long-term borrowed funds of an organization.

Picture 9. Change in the average values of the return on investments ratio of the enterprises engaged in collection, processing and disposal of waste in 2008 – 2017 Picture 9. Change in the average values of the return on investments ratio of the enterprises engaged in collection, processing and disposal of waste in 2008 – 2017

Asset turnover ratio is calculated as the relation of sales revenue to the average value of total assets for a period and characterizes the efficiency of use of all available resources, regardless of the sources of their attraction. The ratio shows how many times a year a complete cycle of production and circulation is made, yielding profit.

This business activity ratio showed a tendency to decrease for ten-year period (Picture 10).

Picture 10. Change in the average values of the asset turnover ratio of the enterprises engaged in collection, processing and disposal of waste in 2008 – 2017 Picture 10. Change in the average values of the asset turnover ratio of the enterprises engaged in collection, processing and disposal of waste in 2008 – 2017

Production structure
The largest share in the total revenue of TOP-1000 is owned by companies, specializing in waste collection (Picture 11).

Picture 11. Distribution of companies by types of output in the total revenue of TOP-1000, % Picture 11. Distribution of companies by types of output in the total revenue of TOP-1000, %

76% of TOP-1000 companies are registered in the Register of small and medium enterprises of the Federal Tax Service of the RF. Besides, share of the companies in the total revenue of TOP-1000 amounts to 61% in 2017, that is almost three times exceeds the average indicator (Picture 12).

Picture 12. Shares of small and medium enterprises in TOP-1000 companies, % Picture 12. Shares of small and medium enterprises in TOP-1000 companies, %

Main regions of activities
TOP-1000 companies are unequally distributed on the territory of Russia because of peculiarities of the geographic position and registered in 77 regions. The largest companies in terms of revenue volume are concentrated in Moscow and Saint-Petersburg (Picture 13).

Picture 13. Distribution of revenue of TOP-1000 companies by regions of Russia Picture 13. Distribution of revenue of TOP-1000 companies by regions of Russia

Financial position score
An assessment of the financial position of TOP-1000 companies shows that majority of companies are in an above the average financial position (Picture 14).

Picture 14. Distribution of TOP-1000 companies by financial position score Picture 14. Distribution of TOP-1000 companies by financial position score

Solvency index Globas
Most of TOP-1000 companies have got Medium Solvency index Globas, points to their ability to repay their debts in time and fully (Picture 15).

Picture 15. Distribution of TOP-1000 companies by solvency index  Globas Picture 15. Distribution of TOP-1000 companies by solvency index Globas

Industrial production index
According to the data from the Federal State Statistics Service, during 12 months of 2018 increasing tendency for the industrial production index of the enterprises engaged in collection, processing and disposal of waste is observed (Picture 16).

Picture 16. Industrial production index of manufacture of the enterprises engaged in collection, processing and disposal of waste in 2017 – 2018, month to month (%) Picture 16. Industrial production index of manufacture of the enterprises engaged in collection, processing and disposal of waste in 2017 – 2018, month to month (%))

Conclusion
Comprehensive assessment of the activity of largest enterprises engaged in collection, processing and disposal of waste, taking into account the main indexes, financial indicators and ratios, demonstrates the presence of favorable trends (Table 2)

Table 2. Positive and negative trends, assessment factors of the industry
Trends and assessment factors Share of factor, %
Rate of increase (decrease) of average amount of net assets up10
Increase / decrease of share of companies with negative values of net assets down-10
Increase (decrease) rate of average revenue amount down-10
Rate of competition / monopolization up10
Increase (decrease) rate of average net profit (loss) amount up10
Increase / decrease of average net profit amount of TOP-1000 companies up10
Increase / decrease of average net loss amount of TOP-1000 companies down-10
Increase / decrease of average industrial values of the current liquidity ratio up5
Increase / decrease of average industrial values of the return on investments ratio up10
Increase / decrease of average industrial values of the assets turnover ratio, times down-10
Share of small and medium enterprises in the industry in terms of revenue volume more than 22% up10
Regional concentration up5
Financial position (major share) up10
Solvency index Globas (major share) up10
Industrial production index up10
Average value of factors up4,0

Up — positive trend (factor) , Up — negative trend (factor).

Ranking
Profit level in recycling

Information agency Credinform has prepared a ranking of the largest Russian companies engaged in waste collection and recycling. The largest enterprises (TOP-10) engaged in waste collection and recycling, except metal waste, in terms of annual revenue were selected according to the data from the Statistical Register for the available periods (2015-2017). Then the companies were ranged by net profit ratio (Table 1). The analysis was based on the data from the Information and Analytical system Globas.

Net profit ratio (%) is calculated as a ratio of net profit (loss) to sales revenue. The ratio reflects the company’s level of sales profit.

The ratio doesn’t have the standard value. It is recommended to compare the companies within the industry or the change of a ratio in time for a certain company. The negative value of the ratio indicates about net loss. The higher is the ratio value, the better the company operates.

The calculation of practical values of financial indicators, which might be considered as normal for a certain industry, has been developed and implemented in the Information and Analytical system Globas by the experts of the Information Agency Credinform, taking into account the actual situation of the economy as a whole and the industries. In 2017 the average practical value of net profit ratio for companies engaged in waste collection and recycling was higher than 2.33%.

For the most full and fair opinion about the company’s financial position the whole set of financial indicators and ratios should be taken into account.

Table 1. Net profit, revenue, net profit margin, solvency index Globas of the largest Russian companies engaged in waste collection and recycling (TOP-10)
Name, INN, region, activity Revenue, mln RUB Net profit (loss), mln RUB Net profit margin, % Solvency index Globas
2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
LLC KHARTIYA
INN 7703770101 Moscow
Waste collection
down2345 up2539 up243 up262 up10,36 down10,31 202 Strong
LLC ORIS PROM
INN 7725146955 Moscow
Recovery of sorted materials
down3761 up5781 up18 up323 up0,47 up5,59 149 Superior
LLC SHLAKSERVIS
INN 7445026038 Chelyabinsk region
Recycling of other secondary non-metallic raw materials
up1743 up1808 up84 up72 up4,80 down3,97 175 High
NAO AVTOPARK #6 SPETSTRANS
INN 7830000440 Saint-Petersburg
Waste collection
up1273 up1601 up19 up52 up1,49 up3,25 161 Superior
LLC EKOLAIN
INN 7734690939 Moscow
Waste collection
down1657 up2334 down217 down53 down13,10 down2,27 255 Medium
NAO EKOS
INN 8619008017 Sverdlovsk region
Waste collection
up7160 down5898 up367 down123 up5,12 down2,09 200 Strong
LLC MINERALOPT
INN 5905291122 Perm region
Waste collection
up3580 down1704 up44 down31 up1,22 up1,82 268 Medium
AVTOPARK #1 SPETSTRANS
INN 7830002705 Saint-Petersburg
Waste collection
up1733 up2207 down-129 up2 down-7,44 up0,07 220 Strong
SPB GUDP TSENTR
INN 7812021254 Saint-Petersburg
Waste collection
up2812 up2984 up-95 up-37 up-3,37 up-1,24 217 Strong
NAO MUSOROUBOROCHNAYA KOMPANIYA
INN 2308131994 Krasnodar region
Collection of non-hazardous waste
down2137 up2158 down22 down-33 down1,04 down-1,54 267 Medium
Total for TOP-10 companies up28201 up29014 up789 up847    
Average value for TOP-10 companies up2820 up2901 up79 up85 up2,68 down2,66
Average industry value up94 up98 up1,3 up1,7 up1,37 up1,75

Up — growth of indicator in comparison with prior period, Up — decline of indicator in comparison with prior period.

Average value of net profit ratio for TOP-10 companies is higher than average industry and practical values. In 2017 five companies from the TOP-10 list improved their indicators in comparison with prior period.

Picture 1. Net profit ratio and revenue of the largest Russian companies engaged in waste collection and recycling (ТОP-10) Picture 1. Net profit ratio and revenue of the largest Russian companies engaged in waste collection and recycling (ТОP-10)

For the last 10 years, the average values of net profit ratio showed the increasing tendency (Picture 2).

Picture 2. Change in average industry values of the net profit ratio of the Russian companies engaged in waste collection and recycling in 2008 – 2017 Picture 2. Change in average industry values of the net profit ratio of the Russian companies engaged in waste collection and recycling in 2008 – 2017