Ranking
Asset turnover of the largest Russian stone quarrying companies

Information agency Credinform has prepared a ranking of the largest Russian stone quarrying companies. The companies with the largest volume of annual revenue (TOP-10) have been selected for the ranking, according to the data from the Statistical Register for the latest available accounting periods (2016 and 2015). Then they have been ranked by asset turnover ratio (Table 1). The analysis was based on the data from the Information and Analytical system Globas.

Asset turnover is a ratio of sales revenue to average total assets for the period. It is one of the activity ratios and it indicates resource efficiency regardless of source. This ratio shows the number of profit-bearing complete production and distribution cycles per annum.

A calculation of practical values of financial ratios, which might be considered as normal for a certain industry, has been developed and implemented in the Information and Analytical system Globas by the experts of the Information Agency Credinform, having taken into account the current situation in the economy as a whole and in the industries. The practical value of asset turnover ratio for stone quarrying companies amounted from 0.7 in 2016.

The whole set of financial indicators and ratios of a company is to be considered to get the fullest and fairest opinion about the company’s financial standing.

Table 1. Net profit, revenue, asset turnover ratio (ATr), solvency index Globas of the largest Russian stone quarrying companies (TOP-10)
Name, INN, region Net profit, mln RUB Revenue, mln RUB Asset turnover, times Solvency index Globas
2015  2016  2015  2016  2015  2016 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Kamennogorsk Integrated Plant of Non-metallic Materials NJSC
INN 4704006013 Leningrad region
-7,79 -8,97 666,75 763,19 2,84 3,49 310 Adequate
Orsk Quarry Administration PJSC
INN 5615002820 Orenburg region
16,16 97,44 1 145,59 2 057,88 1,41 2,77 169 Superior
Prionezhe Mining Company LLC
INN 1020009123 Republic of Karelia
-57,37 26,34 1 208,83 1 440,36 1,23 1,79 283 Medium
SpecTechProject LLC
INN 7430020322 Chelyabinsk region
2,94 8,11 611,97 836,30 1,21 1,72 277 Medium
Korfovsky Stone Quarry PJSC
INN 2720002950 Khabarovsk Territory
76,45 5,74 963,55 983,22 1,23 1,27 229 Strong
KARELPRODRESURS LLC
INN 1001138331 Republic of Karelia
0,20 8,02 1 356,89 1 709,17 0,62 0,84 264 Medium
First Non-Metallic Company PJSC
INN 7708670326 Moscow
35,97 45,20 3 905,91 5 606,33 0,56 0,79 233 Strong
Sunsky Quarry LLC
INN 1003008176 Republic of Karelia
0,18 11,81 712,98 905,09 0,63 0,78 265 Medium
Pavlovsk Nerud NJSC
INN 3620013598 Voronezh region
804,23 1 152,42 3 565,87 3 813,51 0,58 0,68 226 Strong
PNK-Ural LLC
INN 7417018878 Chelyabinsk region
-78,79 -93,92 2 931,12 3 148,45 0,46 0,49 328 Adequate
Total for TOP-10 79,22 125,22 1 706,94 2 126,35      
Average value of TOP-10 7,92 12,52 170,69 212,63 1,08 1,46  
Industry average value 0,01 0,41 31,80 31,80 0,67 0,70  

Average asset turnover ratio of TOP-10 companies in 2016 is higher than the practical one and higher than the average industry value. In 2016 eight companies of TOP-10 have a ratio value higher, and two companies have a ratio lower than the practical one (green and orange colors respectively in columns 6 and 7 of Table 1 and in Picture 1). In 2016 three of TOP-10 companies have a decrease in net profit as compared to the prior period, or have loss (red highlight in column 3 of Table 1).

Picture 1. Asset turnover ratio and revenue of the largest Russian stone quarrying companies (TOP-10) Picture 1. Asset turnover ratio and revenue of the largest Russian stone quarrying companies (TOP-10)

Industry average values of asset turnover ratio within the last 10 years follow a downward trend. In 2012-2015 the ratio value was lower than the 2016 practical value. This may indicate a certain downturn in the sector (Picture 2).

Picture 2. Change of industry average values of asset turnover ratio of Russian stone quarrying companies in 2007-2016 Picture 2. Change of industry average values of asset turnover ratio of Russian stone quarrying companies in 2007-2016

Eight of TOP-10 companies have got from superior to medium solvency index Globas, which indicates their ability to meet debt obligations timely and in full.

Kamennogorsk Integrated Plant of Non-metallic Materials NJSC and PNK-Ural LLC have got an adequate solvency index Globas, due to the companies being defendants in debt collection arbitration proceedings and loss within the balance sheet figures. Index development trends are stable.

Ranking
Return on sales of the largest Russian food retailers

Information agency Credinform prepared a ranking of the largest Russian food retailers. Companies with the highest volume of revenue (TOP-10) were selected for this ranking according to the data from the Statistical Register for the latest available periods (2016 and 2015). The enterprises were ranked by return on sales ratio (Table 1). The analysis was based on data from the Information and Analytical system Globas.

Return on sales (%) is calculated as a share of operating revenue in total sales of the company. Return on sales ratio indicates the efficiency of production and commercial activity, and shows funds volume resulting from sales of products after production costs, taxes and loan interests.

Difference in competitive strategies and product ranges defines the variety of return on sales of companies within the industry. That is why return on sales of two different companies at equal values of revenue, operating costs and profit before tax could vary influenced by interest payments on net profit value.

Taking into account the actual situation both in economy in general and in the sector, the experts of the Information agency Credinform have developed and implemented in the Information and Analytical system Globas the calculation of practical values of financial ratios, which can be recognized as normal for a particular industry. The practical value for food retailers in 2016 is up to 2,87%.

For the most complete and objective view of the financial condition of the enterprise it is necessary to pay attention to the complex indicators and financial ratios of the company.

Table 1. Net profit, revenue, return on sales, Solvency index Globas of the largest Russian food retailers (TOP-10)
Name, INN, region Net profit, mln RUB Revenue, mln RUB Return on sales, % Solvency index Globas
2015  2016  2015  2016  2015  2016 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
LLC VKUSVILL
INN 7734675810 Moscow
278,3 432,6 5 585,6 18 052,5 3,95 7,10 218 Strong
LLC TAMERLAN
INN 3442050010 Volgograd region
563,1 670,4 19 233,9 19 533,9 3,02 2,63 180 High
LLC AGROASPEKT
INN 7715277300 Moscow
1 373,0 4 957,1 96 793,1 101 200,6 6,98 2,12 136 Superior
LLC COMPANY HOLIDAY
INN 5406277570 Novosibirsk region
241,4 25,9 58 781,2 56 469,2 1,61 1,35 235 Strong
LLC MAYAK
INN 3811125221 Irkutsk region
163,7 307,4 11 370,5 15 338,1 1,75 0,96 228 Strong
ОLLC TRADING HOLDING SIBIRSKIY GIGANT
INN 5405289421 Novosibirsk region
227,1 150,2 12 713,8 14 355,2 -1,03 0,09 225 Strong
LLC SLADKAYA ZHIZN N.N.
INN 5257041777 Nizhniy Novgorod region
2 108,5 1 642,8 72 701,1 73 438,7 -0,96 -0,32 188 High
LLC INVESTPROEKT
INN 5047081220 Moscow region
15,3 -260,4 13 370,5 12 829,6 -2,64 -0,64 320 Adequate
LLC BETA-M
INN 7715437850 Moscow
-21,9 -12,2 2 689,7 11 970,1 0,75 -1,70 316 Adequate
LLC ALBION-2002
INN 5257056036 Nizhniy Novgorod region
-1 268,3 -435,6 22 929,1 42 150,5 -0,79 -17,96 278 Medium
Total for TOP-10 368,0 747,8 31 616,9 36 533,8      
Average value for TOP-10 companies 36,8 74,8 3 161,7 3 653,4 1,26 -0,64  
Average value for industry 0,5 0,5 31,6 35,8 2,83 2,87  

Average value of return on sales ratio for the TOP-10 in 2016 is negative and lower than for the practical average. Two companies in TOP-10 have values higher than practical in 2016, four companies – lower, and four have negative values (marked with green, orange and red in columns 6 and 7 of Table 1 and on Picture 1 respectively). Six companies have reduced net profit or revenue figures in 2016 compared to the previous period, or have losses (filled with red in columns 3 and 5 of Table 1).

Picture 1. Return on sales ratio and revenue of the largest Russian food retailers (TOP-10) Picture 1. Return on sales ratio and revenue of the largest Russian food retailers (TOP-10)

The average industry indicators of return on sales ratio over the past ten years demonstrate instability. In 2009 and 2015, the indicators were below the practical value of 2016. This may indicate a certain decrease in economic efficiency in this area of activity during periods of crisis in the economy (Picture 2).

Picture 2. Change in average industry values of return on sales ratio of the Russian food retailers in 2007 – 2016 Picture 2. Change in average industry values of return on sales ratio of the Russian food retailers in 2007 – 2016

Eight companies in TOP-10 got high, strong, medium and superior indexes Globas that indicates their ability to timely and fully fulfill debt liabilities.

LLC INVESTPROEKT and LLC BETA-M has got adequate Solvency index Globas https://globas.credinform.ru/en-GB/home/auth due to the presence of information about participating as a defendant in arbitration cases, delays in implementation of liabilities and losses in balance sheet structure. Indexes development forecast is stable.

Moreover, following the results of the Federal Tax Service of the RF (FTS) check, LLC BETA-M has a record as of 21.08.2017 on unreliability of the legal address.