Ranking
Assets turnover ratio of the largest Russian companies engaged in sand, gravel, clay and kaolin extraction

Information Agency Credinform http://www.credinform.ru/en-US has prepared the ranking of the largest Russian companies engaged in sand, gravel, clay and kaolin extraction. The largest enterprises (TOP-10) in terms of annual revenue were selected according to the data from the Statistical Register for the latest available periods (2016 and 2015). Then the companies were ranged by assets turnover ratio (Table 1). The analysis was based on data of the Information and Analytical system Globas.

Assets turnover is the ratio of sales revenue and company’s average total assets for a period. Показатель относится к группе коэффициентов деловой активности and characterizes the effectiveness of using of all available resources, regardless the source of their attraction. The ratio shows how many times per year the full cycle of production and circulation is performed, generating the corresponding effect in the form of profit.

The calculation of practical values of financial indicators, which might be considered as normal for a certain industry, has been developed and implemented in the Information and Analytical system Globas by the experts of Information Agency Credinform, taking into account the actual situation of the economy as a whole and the industries. In 2016 the practical value of assets turnover ratio for the companies engaged in sand, gravel, clay and kaolin extraction starts from 0,68.

For the most full and fair opinion about the company’s financial position, the whole set of financial indicators and ratios of the company should be taken into account.

Table 1. Net profit, revenue, assets turnover ratio, solvency index Globas of the largest Russian companies engaged in sand, gravel, clay and kaolin extraction (TOP-10)
Name, INN, region Net profit, mln RUB Revenue, mln RUB Assets turnover ratio, times Solvency index Globas
2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NAO KAMENNOGORSKOE KARYEROUPRAVLENIE
INN 4704002227 Leningrad region
-3,0 -23,8 1 025,9 1 016,6 2,90 2,95 292 Medium
LLLC DONSKOI KAMEN
INN 6148556263 Rostov region
115,0 44,8 2 434,1 12 783,0 2,71 2,57 260 Medium
NAO NOVOSIBIRSKOE KARYEROUPRAVLENIE
INN 5403102519 Novosibirsk region
149,2 81,7 2 104,2 2 108,7 1,68 1,68 242 Strong
LLC BENTONIT KHAKASII
INN 1903023547 The Republic of Khakassia
137,2 179,8 774,9 1 065,8 1,39 1,58 175 High
LLC Bogaevskii quarry
INN 5075019720 Moscow region
92,4 237,1 608,4 837,9 1,22 1,41 231 Strong
LLC LAFARGE AGGREGATES AND CONCRETE
INN 7705155052 The Republic of Karelia
-380,9 -322,7 1 069,9 1 631,0 0,76 1,17 303 Adequate
NAO BOGAEVSKII QUARRY
INN 5075011344 Moscow region
139,8 329,5 1 214,1 1 528,0 0,93 1,01 200 Strong
LLC OBLNERUDPROM
INN 5007038980 Moscow region
34,5 62,3 772,2 836,4 0,96 1,01 239 Strong
LLC SEVERENERGO
INN 8911023007 Tyumen region
117,8 172,9 287,9 1 028,7 0,35 0,98 216 Strong
PAO RAMENSKII MINING AND REFINING PLANT
INN 5040002187 Moscow region
139,8 170,0 1 477,5 1 580,9 0,83 0,83 215 Strong
Total for TOP-10 group of companies 541,8 931,5 11 768,9 14 417,1      
Average value within TOP-10 group of companies 54,2 93,1 1 176,9 1 441,7 1,37 1,52  
Industry average value 0,06 0,03 31,8 36,5 0,67 0,68  

In 2016, the average value of assets turnover ratio within TOP-10 group of companies is higher than practical and industry average values. In 2016, all companies from TOP-10 list have values higher than practical value (green color in column 7 of Table 1 and Picture 1). Four companies from TOP-10 list have decrease in net profit and revenue or have loss (red color in columns 3 and 5 of Table 1).

Picture 1. Assets turnover ratio and revenue of the largest Russian companies engaged in sand, gravel, clay and kaolin extraction (TOP-10) Picture 1. Assets turnover ratio and revenue of the largest Russian companies engaged in sand, gravel, clay and kaolin extraction (TOP-10)

For the last 10 years, the average values of assets turnover ratio showed negative trend. From 2012 to 2015, the values were lower than 2016 practical values. This may be a sign of economic slowdown in the industry (Picture 2).

Picture 2. The change of assets turnover ratio average values within 2007-2016 for the Russian companies engaged in sand, gravel, clay and kaolin extraction Picture 2. The change of assets turnover ratio average values within 2007-2016 for the Russian companies engaged in sand, gravel, clay and kaolin extraction

Nine companies from TOP-10 list have the upper levels of solvency index Globas, this fact shows the ability of the companies to meet their obligations in time and fully.

LLC LAFARGE AGGREGATES AND CONCRETE has adequate level of solvency index Globas due to participation as a defendant in debt collection arbitration proceedings, late fulfillment of obligations and losses in balance figures. The forecast for index development is stable.

Article
Trends in the field of marine fishery

Information agency Credinform presents overview of trends in the field of marine fishery.

The companies with the highest volume of revenue (TOP-100 and TOP-1000) were selected for the analysis, according to the data from the Statistical Register for the latest available periods (for 2016 and 2015). The analysis was based on the data from the Information and Analytical system Globas.

Legal forms and unreliable data

The most widespread legal form is a limited liability company. Non-public joint-stock companies and fishery work associations also make a significant share. (Picture 1).

Picture 1. Distribution of TOP-1000 companies by legal forms, % Picture 1. Distribution of TOP-1000 companies by legal forms, %

According to the results of investigation of the Federal Tax Service of the RF, 2,9% companies of the industry have records of unreliable data brought in the Unified Register of Legal Entities (EGRUL) (Picture 2).

Picture 2. Shares of TOP-1000 companies, with records in the EGRUL about unreliable data, % Picture 2. Shares of TOP-1000 companies, with records in the EGRUL about unreliable data, %

Sales revenue

Revenue volume of 10 leaders of the industry in 2016 was 25% of the total revenue of the 1000 largest companies. The largest company in terms of revenue volume in 2016 became JSC OKEANRYBFLOT (Picture 3).

Picture 3. Shares of TOP-10 companies in the total revenue of TOP-1000 in 2016, % Picture 3. Shares of TOP-10 companies in the total revenue of TOP-1000 in 2016, %/strong>

The best results in the industry in terms of revenue volume for ten years were achieved in 2016. During crisis periods in the economy in 2010 and from 2012 to 2014 decrease of average industrial indicators was observed. (Picture 4).

Picture 4. Change of the average industrial indicators of revenue of the companies involved in the field of marine fishery in 2007 – 2016 Picture 4. Change of the average industrial indicators of revenue of the companies involved in the field of marine fishery in 2007 – 2016

Profit and loss

Profit volume of the 10 largest companies in the industry in 2016 was 37% of the total profit of TOP-1000 companies. JSC OKEANRYBFLOT also takes lead according to the profit volume in 2016 (Picture 5).

Picture 5. Shares of TOP-10 companies in the total profit volume of TOP-1000 companies in 2016, % Picture 5. Shares of TOP-10 companies in the total profit volume of TOP-1000 companies in 2016, %

The average industrial values of profit of companies for ten years are not stable. Decrease of indicators was observed in 2012 - 2014 on the backwards of crisis phenomena in the economy. The best results were achieved in 2016. (Picture 6).

Picture 6. Change of the average industrial profit values of marine fishery companies in 2007 – 2016 Picture 6. Change of the average industrial profit values of marine fishery companies in 2007 – 2016

269 loss-making companies were observed in 2015 among TOP-1000 companies. In 2016 their amount decreased to 254 or almost to 6%. Besides, average loss amount has 32% decreased. For the rest TOP-1000 companies average profit amount decreased to 11% for the same period (Picture 7).

Picture 7. Amount of loss-making companies, average values of profit and loss of TOP-1000 companies in 2015 – 2016 Picture 7. Amount of loss-making companies, average values of profit and loss of TOP-1000 companies in 2015 – 2016

Key financial ratios

For ten years the average industrial values of the current liquidity ratio beginning from 2010 are in the interval of recommended values - from 1,0 to 2,0. (Picture 8).

Current liquidity ratio (current assets to short-term liabilities of the company) shows the adequacy of the enterprise's funds to pay off its short-term obligations. .

Solvency ratio (equity to total assets) shows the dependence of the company on external loans. The recommended value: >0,5. A value less than a minimum one indicates dependence on external sources of funds.

A calculation of practical values of financial ratios, which might be considered as normal for a certain industry, has been developed and implemented in the Information and Analytical system Globas by the experts of Information Agency Credinform, having taken into account the current situation in the economy as a whole and in the industries. The practical value of solvency ratio for marine fishery companies in 2016 amounts from 0,01 to 0,99.

Average industrial indicators of the ratio were within the interval of recommended value in 2012 and 2013 and within the interval of practical values during decade period (Picture 8).

Picture 8. Change of average industrial values of the current liquidity and solvency ratios of marine fishery companies in 2007 – 2016 Picture 8. Change of average industrial values of the current liquidity and solvency ratios of marine fishery companies in 2007 – 2016

Over a ten-year period instability of indicators of the return on investments ratio is observed. During crisis periods in the economy (2008, 2012, 2013) indicators were decreasing from year to year (Picture 9). The ratio is net profit to the total equity and long-term liabilities and demonstrates profit from the equity involved into commercial activities and long-term external funds of the company.

During the same period indicators of the product profitability ratio steadily increased (Picture 9). The highest growth of the indicators was observed in 2015 - 2016. The ratio is sales revenue to expenses from ordinary activities. In general, profitability indicates the economic efficiency of production.

Picture 9. Change of average industrial values of the return on investments and product profitability ratios of marine fishery companies in 2007 – 2016 Picture 9. Change of average industrial values of the return on investments and product profitability ratios of marine fishery companies in 2007 – 2016

Indicators of the assets turnover ratio for ten years demonstrate relative stability with soft decrease and increase periods (Picture 10).

The assets turnover ratio is sales revenue to average total assets for a period and characterizes the effectiveness of using of all available resources, regardless the source of their attraction. The ratio shows how many times per year the full cycle of production and circulation is performed, generating profit.

The equity turnover ratio is calculated as a ratio of revenue to yearly average sum of equity and demonstrates the company’s usage rate of total assets. From 2007 to 2012 a significant decrease of the indicators was observed with following increase in 2014 – 2015 (Picture 10).

Picture 10. Change of average industrial values of the business activity ratios of marine fishery companies in 2007 – 2016 Picture 10. Change of average industrial values of the business activity ratios of marine fishery companies in 2007 – 2016

Dynamics of business activity

Over a 25-year period, the registered companies from TOP-1000 list are unequally distributed by the year of foundation. Most of the companies engaged in marine fishery were founded in 1998 and 2011 (Picture 11).

Picture 11. Distribution of TOP-1000 companies in terms of years of foundation Picture 11. Distribution of TOP-1000 companies in terms of years of foundation

Marine fishery industry attracted the most interest of business until 1999 and during 2010 – 2014, when at average 45 – 46 companies were registered per year. (Picture 12).

Marine fishery industry attracted the most interest of business until 1999 and during 2010 – 2014, when at average 45 – 46 companies were registered per year. (Picture 12). Marine fishery industry attracted the most interest of business until 1999 and during 2010 – 2014, when at average 45 – 46 companies were registered per year. (Picture 12).

Main regions of activity

Marine fishery companies are distributed unequally on the territory of the country. Most of the companies are registered in Sakhalin region and Kamchatka territory. Both regions locate on the Pacific coast accommodating the largest fish resources (Picture 13). TOP-1000 companies are registered in 46 regions of Russia.

Picture 13. Distribution of TOP -1000 companies throughout regions of Russia  Picture 13. Distribution of TOP -1000 companies throughout regions of Russia

Overwhelming majority of marine fishery companies is centered in the Far Eastern district of the RF (Picture 14).

Picture 14. Distribution of TOP-1000 companies throughout federal districts of Russia Picture 14. Distribution of TOP-1000 companies throughout federal districts of Russia

Share of companies from the TOP-1000 group, having branches or representative offices, amounts to 6%.

Participation in arbitration proceedings

More than quarter of companies in the industry does not participate in arbitration proceedings. Most of the companies participate in a negligible number of arbitration cases. (Picture 15).

Picture 15. Distribution of TOP -1000 companies by participation in arbitration proceedings Picture 15. Distribution of TOP -1000 companies by participation in arbitration proceedings

Reliability index

In terms of signs of «fly-by-night» or unreliable companies the majority of companies demonstrate extremely low risk of cooperation (Picture 16).

Picture 16. Distribution of TOP -1000 by Reliability index Picture 16. Distribution of TOP -1000 by Reliability index

Financial position score

Assessment of financial state of the sector’s companies indicates that the most of the companies have an average financial standing. However, over a quarter of the TOP-1000 companies have an unstable and critical financial standing (Picture 17).

Picture 17. Distribution of TOP -1000 companies by Financial position score Picture 17. Distribution of TOP -1000 companies by Financial position score

Liquidity index

Almost half of the sector`s companies (48%) demonstrate a minimal or insignificant level of bankruptcy risk in the short-term period. However, the share of enterprises with above average and the highest levels of risk amounts to 23% (Picture 18).

Picture 18. Distribution of TOP -1000 companies by Liquidity index Picture 18. Distribution of TOP -1000 companies by Liquidity index

Solvency index Globas

Over a half of the TOP-1000 marine fishery companies (54%) have got from superior to medium Solvency index Globas (Picture 19).

Together with key indexes, financial figures and ratios, it may demonstrate relatively favorable trends within the industry.

Picture 19. Distribution of TOP -1000 by Solvency index Globas Picture 19. Distribution of TOP -1000 by Solvency index Globas