Article
Trends in vehicle manufacturing

Information agency Credinform has prepared a review of trends of the largest Russian manufacturers of marine, rail and air vehicles and equipment.

The largest manufacturers of marine, rail, air vehicles and equipment, excluding road transport and military vehicles (TOP-10 and TOP-1000) in terms of annual revenue were selected for the analysis according to the data from the Statistical Register for the latest available periods (2015-2017). The analysis was based on the data of the Information and Analytical system Globas.

Net assets are total assets less total liabilities. This indicator reflects the real value of the property of an enterprise. When the company’s debt exceeds the value of its property, the indicator is considered negative (insufficiency of property).

Table  1. The largest Russian companies with the highest and lowest net assets volume, engaged in vehicles and equipment manufacturing, 2015 - 2017
Name, INN, activity Net assets value, bln RUB Solvency index Globas
2015 2016 2017
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 JSC UNITED SHIPBUILDING CORPORATION
INN 7838395215 Saint Petersburg
Construction of ships, vessels and floating structures
164,70 up183,06 up241,87 257 Medium
2 JSC AVIATION HOLDING COMPANY SUKHOI
INN 7740000090 Moscow
Manufacture of helicopters, airplanes and other aircraft
189,16 down184,66 down123,24 163 Superior
3 JSC SUKHOI CIVIL AIRCRAFT
INN 7714175986 Moscow
Manufacture of helicopters, airplanes and other aircraft
-30,29 up73,87 down73,14 256 Medium
4 JSC PRODUCTION ASSOCIATION SEVMASH
INN 2902059091 Arkhangelsk region
Construction of ships, vessels and floating structures
33,60 up44,13 up54,16 170 Superior
5 JSC ULAN-UDE AVIATION PLANT
INN 0323018510 Republic of Buryatia
Manufacture of helicopters, airplanes and other aircraft
43,84 down38,88 up39,73 222 Strong
996 JSC LYUDINOVSKY DIESEL LOCOMOTIVE PLANT
INN 4024000014 Kaluga region
Services for reconstruction and equipping (completion) of railway locomotives, tram motor cars and other rolling stock
0,01 down-1,05 down-1,80 318 Adequate
997 JSC ENGELS LOCOMOTIVE PLANT
INN 6449062691 Saratov region
Manufacture of railway locomotives and rolling stock
-0,42 down-0,95 down-1,87 341 Adequate
998 JSC NOVOKUZNETSK CAR BUILDING PLANT
INN 4217101428 Kemerovo region
Manufacture of non-self-propelled railway, tram and other cars for the transport of goods
In liquidation since 02.03.2017
-0,37 down-0,91 down-2,37 600 Insufficient
999 JSC ARMAVIR HEAVY ENGINEERING PLANT
INN 2302044590 Krasnodar territory
Manufacture of non-self-propelled railway, tram and other cars for the transport of goods
In liquidation since 13.07.2016
-2,64 down-2,66 down-4,48 600 Insufficient
1000 JSC PROMTRAKTOR-VAGON
INN 2128701370 Republic of Chuvashia
Services for reconstruction and equipping (completion) of railway locomotives, tram motor cars and other rolling stock
-4,81 down-9,14 down-102,03 366 Adequate

Up — growth of indicator in comparison with prior period, Up — decrease of indicator in comparison with prior period.

For the last 10 years, the average values of net assets showed the increasing tendency (Picture 1).

Picture 1. Change in average net assets value in 2008 – 2017 Picture 1. Change in average net assets value in 2008 – 2017

The shares of TOP-1000 companies with insufficient property have trend to increase over the past three years (Picture 2).

Picture 2. Shares of companies with negative net assets value in TOP-1000, 2015 - 2017 Picture 2. Shares of companies with negative net assets value in TOP-1000, 2015 - 2017

Sales revenue
In 2017, total revenue of 10 largest companies was 45% of TOP-1000 total revenue (Picture 3). This testifies high level of monopolization in the industry.

Picture 3. Shares of TOP-10 companies in TOP-1000 total profit for 2017 Picture 3. Shares of TOP-10 companies in TOP-1000 total profit for 2017

In general, there is a trend to increase in industry average revenue over the past 10 years (Picture 4).

Picture 4. Change in industry average net profit in 2008-2017 Picture 4. Change in industry average net profit in 2008-2017

Profit and loss
In 2017, profit of 10 largest companies in the region amounted to 60% of TOP-1000 total profit (Picture 5).

Picture 5. Shares of TOP-10 companies in TOP-1000 total profit for 2017 Picture 5. Shares of TOP-10 companies in TOP-1000 total profit for 2017

For the last ten years, there is an increase of the industry average net profit values (Picture 6).

Picture 6. Change in industry average net profit (loss) in 2008-2017 Picture 6. Change in industry average net profit (loss) in 2008-2017

For the three-year period, the average net profit values of TOP-1000 companies show the increasing tendency. The average net loss also increases (Picture 7).

Picture 7. Change in average profit and loss of ТОP-1000 in 2015 – 2017 Picture 7. Change in average profit and loss of ТОP-1000 in 2015 – 2017

Key financial ratios
For the last ten years, the average values of the current liquidity ratio were above the recommended one - from 1,0 to 2,0 with a trend to increase (Picture 8).

Current liquidity ratio (current assets to short-term liabilities) shows the sufficiency of company’s assets to repay on short-term liabilities.

Picture 8. Change in industry average values of current liquidity ratio in 2008 – 2017 Picture 8. Change in industry average values of current liquidity ratio in 2008 – 2017

For the last ten years, relatively low level of ROI ratio with a trend to increase was observed (Picture 9).

ROI ratio is calculated as net profit to sum of shareholders equity and long-term liabilities, and shows the return of equity involved in commercial activities and long-term borrowed funds.

Picture 9. Change in average values of ROI ratio in 2008 – 2017 Picture 9. Change in average values of ROI ratio in 2008 – 2017

Assets turnover ratio is the ratio of sales revenue and company’s average total assets for a period. It characterizes the effectiveness of using of all available resources, regardless the source of their attraction. The ratio shows how many times per year the full cycle of production and circulation is performed, generating the corresponding effect in the form of profit.

For the last ten years, business activity ratio demonstrated the downward trend (Picture 10).

Picture 10. Change in average values of assets turnover ratio in 2008 – 2017 Picture 10. Change in average values of assets turnover ratio in 2008 – 2017

Production structure
The highest share in total revenue of TOP-1000 falls for companies engaged in manufacture of helicopters, planes and other aircraft (Picture 11).

Picture 11. Distribution of activity types in total revenue of TOP-1000, % Picture 11. Distribution of activity types in total revenue of TOP-1000, %

73% companies of TOP-1000 are registered in the Register of small and medium-sized businesses of the Federal Tax Service of the Russian Federation. At the same time, their share in total revenue of TOP-1000 slightly exceeds 2% (Picture 12).

Picture 12. Shares of small and medium-sized enterprises in TOP-1000, % Picture 12. Shares of small and medium-sized enterprises in TOP-1000, %

Main regions of activity
Companies of TOP-1000 are located across the country extremely unequally, and registered in 67 districts. Almost 36% of their revenue volume are concentrated in Moscow and Saint Petersburg (Picture 13).

Picture 13. Distribution of TOP-1000 revenue by districts of Russia Picture 13. Distribution of TOP-1000 revenue by districts of Russia

Financial position score
Assessment of the financial position of TOP-1000 companies shows that the majority of them have average financial position (Picture 14).

Picture 14. Distribution of TOP-1000 companies by financial position score Picture 14. Distribution of TOP-1000 companies by financial position score

Solvency index Globas
Most of TOP-1000 companies got Superior/High or Strong/Medium Solvency index Globas. This fact shows the ability to meet their obligations in time and fully (Picture 15).

Picture 15. Distribution of TOP-1000 companies by solvency index  Globas Picture 15. Distribution of TOP-1000 companies by solvency index Globas

Index of industrial production
According to the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat), during 12 months of 2017 - 2018, the trend to decrease of industrial production indexes is observed. For 9 months of 2018, the index decreased by 0,8% at average, and increased by 2,1% for the period of November 2017 – October 2018 (Picture 16).

Picture 16. Index of industrial production of vehicles and equipment in 2017 – 2018, month-to-month (%) Picture 16. Index of industrial production of vehicles and equipment in 2017 – 2018, month-to-month (%)

Conclusion
Complex assessment of activity of the largest manufacturers of vehicles and equipment, taking into account the main indexes, financial ratios and indicators, demonstrates some prevalence of favorable trends (Table 2).

Table  2. Positive and negative trends, evaluation factors of TOP-1000 companies
Trends and evaluation factors Relative share of factors, %
Rate of growth (decline) in the average size of net assets up10
Increase / decrease in the share of enterprises with negative values of net assets down-10
Rate of growth (decline) in the average size of revenue up10
Concentration level of capital down-10
Rate of growth (decline) in the average size of profit (loss) up10
Growth / decline in average values of companies’ net profit up10
Growth / decline in average values of companies’ net loss down-10
Increase / decrease in average values of total liquidity ratio up10
Increase / decrease in average values of return on investment ratio up10
Increase / decrease in average values of asset turnover ratio, times down-10
Share of small and medium-sized businesses in the region in terms of revenue being more than 30% down-10
Regional concentration down-10
Financial position (the largest share) up5
Solvency index Globas (the largest share) up10
Industrial production index down-10
Average value of relative share of factors up0,3

Up — positive trend (factor) , Up — negative trend (factor).

Ranking
Loans and assets of transportation facilities manufacturers

Information agency Credinform has prepared a ranking of the largest Russian transportation facilities and equipment manufacturers. The manufacturers of marine, railway and air carriers and equipment, excluding producers of motor vehicles and fighting vehicles, with the largest annual revenue (TOP-10) were selected for the ranking, according to the data from the Statistical Register for the latest available accounting periods (2014 - 2017). Then they were ranked by solvency ratio (Table 1). The analysis was based on the data from the Information and Analytical system Globas.

Debt to assets ratio (x) is a ratio of current and non-current debt to total assets, and it indicates the share of company's assets being financed by loans.

Total recommended value of the ratio is from 0,2 to 0,5. A value that exceeds the maximum standard value indicates an excessive loan overburden that may facilitate development, but as well may have a negative impact on stability of corporate funds. A value lower than the minimum standard value may speak of a conservative financial management strategy and of an excessive caution in raising new debt funds.

A calculation of practical values of financial ratios, that might be considered as normal for a certain industry, has been developed and implemented in the Information and Analytical system Globas by the experts of Information Agency Credinform, having taken into account the current situation in the economy as a whole and in the industries. Practical value of debt to assets ratio for transportation facilities and equipment manufacturers amounts from 0.32 to 0.99 in 2017.

The whole set of indicators and financial ratios is to be considered to get a full and comprehensive vision of company’s financial standing.

Table  1. Net profit, revenue, solvency index Globas of the largest Russian transportation facilities and equipment manufacturers (TOP-10)
Name, INN, region, type of activity Sales revenue, billion RUB Net profit (loss), billion RUB Debt to assets ratio, (х) Solvency index Globas
2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
METROVAGONMASH NJSC
INN 5029006702 Moscow region
Manufacture of railway locomotives and rolling stock
up26,3 up43,6 up2,4 up2,8 down0,66 up0,50 142 Superior
ZELDORREMMASH JSC
INN 7715729877 Moscow
Provision of services of rebuild and equipping (completion) of railway locomotives, tram motor carriages and other rolling stock
up32,7 up41,2 up0,1 up0,3 up0,51 down0,55 226 Strong
SUKHOI CIVIL AIRCRAFT NJSC
INN 7714175986 Moscow
Manufacture of helicopters, aeroplanes and other aircraft
up46,8 up55,4 up-3,8 up-1,1 up0,54span> down0,58 256 Medium
AVIATION HOLDING COMPANY SUKHOI PJSC
INN 7740000090 Moscow
Manufacture of helicopters, aeroplanes and other aircraft
up108,0 up122,8 down2,4 up4,3 down0,55 down0,60 163 Superior
UNITED SHIPBUILDING CORPORATION NJSC
INN 7838395215 Saint Petersburg
Building of ships, vessels and floating structures
up48,6 down44,8 down0,6 down0,2 down0,65 up0,64 257 Medium
ROSTOV HELICOPTER PRODUCTION COMPLEX ROSTVERTOL named after B.N. Slyusar PJSC
INN 6161021690 Rostov region
Manufacture of helicopters, aeroplanes and other aircraft
up84,3 up99,1 up18,6 down16,7 up0,73 up0,68 167 Superior
ODK-Ufa Engine-Building Production Association
INN 0273008320 Republic of Bashkortostan
Manufacture of turbo-jet and turbo-prop engines and their parts
up68,8 up73,8 up3,5 down12,5 up0,77 up0,69 167 Superior
Tikhvin Railway Car Building Plant NJSC
INN 4715019631 Leningrad region
Manufacture of railway locomotives and rolling stock
up41,8 up49,7 up2,6 down-0,1 up0,72 down0,75 269 Medium
IRKUT CORPORATION NJSC
INN 3807002509 Moscow
Manufacture of helicopters, aeroplanes and other aircraft
up99,9 down84,6 up2,2 up3,0 down0,90 up0,86 175 High
Production Association SEVMASH NJSC
INN 2902059091 Arkhangelsk region
Building of ships, vessels and floating structures
up74,3 up88,8 down5,7 up8,9 up0,90 up0,88 170 Superior
Total for TOP-10 companies up631,5 up703,7 up34,3 up47,4    
Average value for TOP-10 up63,3 up70,4 up3,4 up4,7 up0,69 up0,67
Industry average value up1,41 down1,37 up0,04 down0,00 down0,75 down0,78

Up — improvement compared to prior period, Up — decline compared to prior period.

Average value of debt to assets ratio of TOP-10 companies is above the recommended value, lower than the average industry value and within the range of practical values. In 2017 six of TOP-10 companies showed improvement of the indicator compared to prior period.

Picture 1. Debt to assets ratio and revenue of the largest Russian transport facilities and equipment manufacturers (TOP-10) Picture 1. Debt to assets ratio and revenue of the largest Russian transport facilities and equipment manufacturers (TOP-10)

During the decade, average industry values of debt to assets ratio tend to improve (Picture 2).

Picture 2. Change of industry average values of debt to assets ratio of Russian transport facilities and equipment manufacturers in 2008 – 2017 Picture 2. Change of industry average values of debt to assets ratio of Russian transport facilities and equipment manufacturers in 2008 – 2017