Information agency Credinform presents ranking of the largest Russian holding management companies. Enterprises with the largest volume of annual revenue (TOP-10), engaged in management of holding companies, financial industrial groups and management consultancy, were selected for the analysis, according to the data from the Statistical Register for the latest available periods (for 2015-2017). Then they were ranked by decrease in current liquidity ratio (Table 1). The analysis was made on the basis of the data of the Information and Analytical system Globas.

The current liquidity ratio(х) is calculated as the relation of the sum of working assets to short-term liabilities.

Recommenmded value is from 1,0 to 2,0. Value of the indicator less than 1,0 demonstrates that short-term liabilities exceed current working assets. Therefore, lower limit of the interval reveals need to provide sufficiency of working assets for complete payment of short-term liabilities. Otherwise, it may cause bankruptcy of an enterprise. However, significant increase of short-term assets over liabilities can demonstrate impairment of capital structure and irrational investments of funds.

The experts of the Information agency Credinform, taking into account the actual situation both in the economy as a whole and in sectors, has developed and implemented in the Information and Analytical system Globas the calculation of practical values of financial ratios that can be recognized as normal for a particular industry. For holding management companies practical value of the current liquidity ratio amounted from 0,71 to 5,17 in 2017.

For getting of the most comprehensive and fair picture of the financial standing of an enterprise it is necessary to pay attention to all combination of indicators and financial ratios.

Table 1. Net profit, revenue, current liquidity ratio, solvency index Globas of the largest Russian holding management companies (TOP-10)

Name, INN, region	Revenue, billion RUB			Net profit (loss), billion RUB			Current liquidity rsatio (x), from 1,0 to 2,0			Solvency index Globas
	2016	2017	2018*	2016	2017	2018*	2016	2017	2018*
1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11
AO ROSNEFTEGAZ INN 7705630445 Moscow	800,39	78,23	142,94	-90,44	33,85	177,95	1,90	2802,80	269,24	175 High
JSC RUSSIAN GRIDS INN 7728662669 Moscow	26,66	26,51	27,19	222,44	-13,24	-11,55	9,17	17,47	36,22	226 Strong
JSC RUSSIAN HELICOPTERS INN 7731559044 Moscow	45,20	36,26	35,53	15,46	15,71	19,97	1,36	1,59	1,65	148 Superior
JSC CONCERN RADIO-ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES INN 7703695246 Moscow	24,98	39,83	28,71	1,17	4,38	7,96	1,50	1,38	1,79	151 Superior
JSC United Engine Corporation INN 7731644035 Moscow	32,28	34,44	42,18	0,64	1,74	7,74	1,25	1,23	1,15	158 Superior
LLC SET - SVYAZNOY INN 7714617793 Moscow	59,17	63,32	48,32	-4,26	-0,89	-2,68	1,35	1,20	0,84	299 Medium
JSC Voentorg INN 7704726183 Moscow	66,35	73,90	72,06	0,03	0,04	0,05	1,16	1,15	1,23	210 Strong
LLC BUSINESS-FINANCE INN 7707572492 Moscow	2158,73	3129,78	0,00	0,14	0,57	0,45	1,09	1,08	1,48	269 Medium
LLC PROCTER & GAMBLE INN 7701032910 Moscow	52,38	53,73	2,37	0,32	7,99	1,23	0,63	0,98	6,59	196 High
JSC HOLDING COMPANY METALLOINVEST INN 7705392230 Moscow	221,47	86,66	69,98	207,65	76,93	45,52	10,16	0,94	0,44	271 Medium
Total for TOP-10 companies	3487,61	3622,65	469,28	353,14	127,08	246,65
Average value for TOP-10 companies	348,76	362,26	46,93	35,31	12,71	24,66	2,96	282,98	32,06
Average industrial value	0,09	0,07		0,04	0,01		1,31	1,01

*) data for 2018 are given for reference

growth decrease of indicator to the previous period, decrease of indicator to the previous period

Average value of the current liquidity ratio of the TOP-10 group is significantly higher than the average industrial, recommended and practical values of 2017. Five companies have shown results within the interval of the recommended value in 2018.

Picture 1. Current liquidity ratio and revenue of the largest Russian holding management companies (TOP-10)

Over a ten-year period average industrial values of the current liquidity ratio were, in general, within the interval of recommended values with increasing tendency. (Picture 2).

Picture 2. Change in the average industrial values of the current liquidity ratio of Russian holding management companies in 2008 – 2017

Information agency Credinform has observed trends in the activity of the largest Russian shipbuilding companies.

Enterprises with the largest volume of annual revenue (TOP-10 and TOP-100), were selected for the analysis, according to the data from the Statistical Register for the latest available periods (for 2015-2017). The analysis was made on the basis of the data of the Information and Analytical system Globas.

Net assets is an indicator, reflecting the real value of company's property, is calculated annually as the difference between assets on the enterprise balance and its debt obligations. The indicator of net assets is considered negative (insufficiency of property), if company’s debt exceeds the value of its property.

The largest company in terms of net assets amount is JSC UNITED SHIPBUILDING CORPORATION. In 2018 net assets of the company amounted to almost 250 billion RUB.

JSC VYBORG SHIPYARD had the smallest amount of net assets in the TOP-100 group. Insufficiency of property of the company in 2018 was expressed in negative value -511 million RUB.

For a ten-year period average amount of net assets of TOP-100 companies has increasing tendency (Picture 1).

Picture 1. Change in average indicators of the net asset amount of shipbuilding companies in 2008 – 2017

Share of companies with insufficiency of property in the TOP-100 demonstrate stable standing on relatively high level for the last three years (Picture 2).

Picture 2. Shares of companies with negative values of net assets in TOP-100 companies in в 2015 – 2017

Sales revenue
The revenue volume of 10 leaders of the industry made 84% of the total revenue of TOP-100 companies in 2017(Picture 3). It demonstrates high level of monopolization in the industry.

Picture 3. Shares of participation of TOP-10 companies in the total revenue of TOP-100 companies for 2017

In general, over a ten-year period an increasing tendency in revenue volume is observed (Picture 4).

Picture 4. Change in the average revenue of shipbuilding companies in 2008 – 2017

Profit and losses
The largest company in terms of net profit amount is JSC PO Sevmash. Net profit of the company amounted to 6,6 billion RUB for 2018.

For the last ten years average industrial indicators of net profit have an increasing tendency (Picture 5).

Picture 5. Change in the average indicators of net profit of shipbuilding companies in 2008 – 2017

Over a three-year period, the average values of net profit indicators of TOP-100 companies tend to decrease. Besides, the average value of net loss decreases (Picture 6).

Picture 6. Change in the average indicators of net profit of shipbuilding companies in 2008 – 2017

Key financial ratios
Over the ten-year period the average indicators of the current liquidity ratio most often were above the range of recommended values – from 1,0 up to 2,0 with increasing tendency (Picture 7).

The current liquidity ratio (the relation of the amount of current assets to short-term liabilities) shows the sufficiency of company’s funds for repayment of its short-term liabilities.

Picture 7. Change in the average values of the current liquidity ratio of shipbuilding companies in 2008 – 2017

Sufficiently low level of average values of the indicators of the return on investment ratio with increasing tendency has been observed for ten years (Picture 8).

The ratio is calculated as the relation of net profit to the sum of own capital and long-term liabilities and demonstrates the return on the equity involved in the commercial activity of own capital and the long-term borrowed funds of an organization.

Picture 8. Change in the average values of the return on investment ratio of shipbuilding companies in 2008 – 2017

Asset turnover ratio is calculated as the relation of sales revenue to the average value of total assets for a period and characterizes the efficiency of use of all available resources, regardless of the sources of their attraction. The ratio shows how many times a year a complete cycle of production and circulation is made, yielding profit.

This business activity ratio showed a tendency to decrease for a ten-year period (Picture 9).

Picture 9. Change in the average values of the assets turnover ratio of shipbuilding companies in 2008 – 2017

Small business
65% of the TOP-100 companies are registered in the Register of small and medium enterprises of the Federal Tax Service of the RF. Besides, share of revenue in the total volume in 2017 is more than 1,5%, that is lower than the average indicator countrywide (Picture 10).

Picture 10. Shares of small and medium enterprises in TOP-100 companies

Main regions of activity
TOP-100 enterprises are unequally distributed along the territory of Russia with consideration to geographical position and registered in 29 regions. More than 74% of revenue volume is concentrated in Saint Petersburg, Arkhangelsk region and the Republic of Tatarstan (Picture 11).

Picture 11. Distribution of TOP-100 companies by regions of Russia

Financial position score
An assessment of the financial position of TOP-100 companies shows that the largest number is in average financial position. (Picture 12).

Picture 12. Distribution of TOP-100 companies by financial position score

Solvency index Globas
Most of TOP-1000 companies have got from Medium to Superior Solvency index Globas, that points to their ability to repay their debts in time and fully (Picture 13).

Picture 13. Distribution of TOP-100 companies by solvency index Globas

Conclusion
Comprehensive assessment of the activity of largest Russian shipbuilding enterprises, taking into account the main indexes, financial indicators and ratios, demonstrates the presence of favorable trends (Table 1)

Table 1. Positive and negative trends, assessment factors of the industry

Trends and assessment factors	Share of factor, %
Rate of increase (decrease) of average amount of net assets	10
Increase / decrease of share of companies with negative values of net assets	5
Increase (decrease) rate of average revenue amount	10
Level of competition	-10
Increase (decrease) rate of average net profit (loss) amount	10
Increase / decrease of average net profit amount of TOP-1000 companies	-10
Increase / decrease of average net loss amount of TOP-1000 companies	10
Increase / decrease of average industrial values of the current liquidity ratio	5
Increase / decrease of average industrial values of the return on investments ratio	5
Increase / decrease of average industrial values of the assets turnover ratio, times	-10
Share of small and medium enterprises in the industry in terms of revenue volume more than 22%	-10
Regional concentration	-10
Financial position (major share)	5
Solvency index Globas (major share)	10
Average value of factors	1,4

positive trend (factor), negative trend (factor).