Article
The salary dynamics of Russians in 2014

According to 2014 results, the average salary in Russia amounted to 32 629 RUB. (845 USD), the actual growth of wages was insignificant – only +0,7%. According to official average annual exchange rate of The Central Bank, there was a decrease in salaries by 10,5% in dollar terms (945 USD in 2013). In January-December 2014 the inflation level in general across the country exceeded the planned Russian Government expectations and amounted to 7,6%.

At the moment the significant regional differentiation of the wages is observed on the territory of the Russian Federation. Thus the ratio of maximum (Chukotka Autonomous Okrug) and minimum (Republic of Crimea) salary is estimated almost by 5,5 times.

Traditionally, the highest wage is in the Far North regions and equal districts, Moscow and Saint-Petersburg; moreover according to 2014 results, the actual growth of wages in Moscow was positive, as against Saint-Petersburg with a decrease in ratio by 0,1%.

The salary of Moscow residents is 1,5 times more than salary of Saint-Petersburg residents (61 357 RUB. and 40 676 RUB. respectively).

In addition to Saint-Petersburg, the decrease in 2014 wages was observed in other 28 regions of the country. The last place took The Chechen Republic (-3,4%).

In new subjects of the Russian Federation - Republic of Crimea (14 221 RUB.) and Sevastopol (14 333 RUB.) the salaries, if to take into account the recalculation of currencies, are significantly increased, but still considerably less than in Republic of Kalmykia (the closest list region, 19 384 RUB.).

Taking into account the accelerated inflation and difficult economic situation, it is expected that the current year won’t bring good news and the actual wages in the most regions of the country might decrease in the end of the period.

Maximum and minimum level of salaries, and inflation
№  SubjectAverage2014 salary, RUB.Growth (decrease) to 2013 level, %Inflation January-December 2014, %Growth (decrease) ofactual wage to  2013, %
  Russian Federation 32 629 8,3 7,6 0,7
1 Chukotka Autonomous Okrug 76 204 8,5 3,5 5,1
2 Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Okrug 74 502 7,3 7,6 -0,4
3 Nenets Autonomous Okrug 66 746 6,8 6,6 0,2
4 Magadan Region 61 552 7,9 7,7 0,2
5 Moscow 61 357 9,1 7,9 1,2
6 Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Area - Yugra 57 898 6,2 5,5 0,7
7 Sakhalin Region 54 533 12,5 7,1 5,4
8 Tyumen Region (including the autonomous districts) 54 471 6,8 6,7 0,1
9 Kamchatka Krai 52 883 9,3 7,7 1,7
10 The Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) 50 794 9,9 6,5 3,4
11 Murmansk Region 42 862 7,2 7,7 -0,4
12 Saint-Petersburg 40 676 8,3 8,4 -0,1
13 Komi Republic 39 750 6,5 7,9 -1,4
14 Moscow Region 39 051 8,6 8,1 0,5
15 Khabarovsk Krai 36 260 7,2 7,2 0,0
16 Arkhangelsk Region 35 640 9,6 8,6 1,0
17 Krasnoyarsk Territory 34 073 7,6 6,1 1,4
18 Tomsk Region 32 506 6,8 7,6 -0,8
19 Primorsky Krai 32 441 8,8 7,1 1,7
20 Amur Region 32 261 7,9 8,2 -0,2
21 Leningrad Region 32 115 8,6 7,9 0,7
22 Irkutsk Region 31 407 7,4 6,2 1,2
23 Sverdlovsk Region 29 778 6,4 7,8 -1,4
24 Jewish Autonomous Region 29 292 7,8 7,8 0,0
25 The Republic of Karelia 29 283 5,5 6,7 -1,2
26 Trans-Baikal Territory 29 153 7,6 7,3 0,3
27 The Republic of Khakassia 28 962 7,1 7,3 -0,2
28 The Republic of Tatarstan 28 347 9,0 7,2 1,8
29 Chelyabinsk Region 27 977 8,2 7,1 1,1
30 Kaluga Region 27 973 8,6 9,2 -0,6
31 The Republic of Buryatia 27 803 6,9 8,2 -1,2
32 Tuva Republic 27 747 8,4 5,1 3,3
33 Novosibirsk Region 27 333 6,8 6,5 0,3
34 Perm Region 27 213 9,9 7,1 2,8
35 Kaliningrad Region 26 948 5,9 8,7 -2,8
36 Vologda Region 26 764 7,2 8,1 -1,0
37 Kemerovo Region 26 729 5,4 7,9 -2,4
38 Omsk Region 26 307 5,8 7,4 -1,6
39 Krasnodar Region 25 979 6,9 8,9 -2,0
40 Nizhny Novgorod Region 25 949 9,1 8,2 0,9
41 Samara Region 25 941 10,6 7,2 3,4
42 Tula Region 25 725 11,6 7,8 3,7
43 Novgorod Region 25 167 8,3 7,5 0,8
44 Yaroslavl Region 25 104 9,8 8,5 1,3
45 Tver Region 24 724 7,4 8,3 -0,9
46 The Republic of Bashkortostan 24 647 9,7 6,4 3,4
47 Astrakhan Region 24 465 8,6 6,8 1,8
48 Voronezh Region 24 004 8,1 8,8 -0,6
49 Belgorod Region 23 975 7,8 6,3 1,5
50 Volgograd Region 23 933 13,0 7,3 5,8
51 Ryazan Region 23 791 8,5 8,9 -0,4
52 Udmurtia 23 702 10,5 6,9 3,6
53 Orenburg Region 23 531 9,3 6,8 2,5
54 Lipetsk Region 23 486 8,6 7,5 1,1
55 Rostov Region 23 477 8,6 7,6 1,0
56 Kursk Region 23 161 9,8 7,0 2,7
57 Stavropol Region 22 557 8,9 6,5 2,4
58 Vladimir Region 22 443 9,8 9,2 0,6
59 Penza Region 22 418 8,6 7,3 1,3
60 Altai Republic 22 294 8,3 7,3 1,1
61 The Chechen Republic 22 164 2,2 5,6 -3,4
62 Saratov Region 22 002 7,3 7,3 0,0
63 Smolensk Region 21 970 7,6 9,1 -1,5
64 The Republic of Ingushetia 21 910 2,1 4,4 -2,3
65 Kurgan Region 21 111 8,2 7,7 0,5
66 Ulyanovsk Region 21 096 10,0 7,8 2,3
67 Kirov Region 20 931 8,3 7,3 1,0
68 Pskov Region 20 883 5,6 8,4 -2,8
69 Kostroma Region 20 882 8,6 7,3 1,3
70 Chuvash Republic 20 858 7,2 6,9 0,3
71 Bryansk Region 20 812 8,7 9,1 -0,4
72 Oryol Region 20 804 8,5 8,5 0,0
73 Republic of Adygea 20 801 9,4 7,5 1,9
74 Tambov Region 20 751 8,7 8,4 0,3
75 Ivanovo Region 20 562 8,6 9,1 -0,5
76 Mari El Republic 20 512 10,4 7,3 3,1
77 Republic of North Ossetia - Alania 20 317 4,2 6,2 -2,0
78 The Republic of Mordovia 20 098 11,3 7,5 3,9
79 The Karachay-Cherkess Republic 19 831 10,5 7,1 3,3
80 The Kabardino-Balkar Republic 19 698 7,8 6,7 1,1
81 Altai Region 19 457 7,4 8,1 -0,7
82 The Republic of Dagestan 19 398 12,9 4,9 8,1
83 Republic of Kalmykia 19 384 9,8 6,0 3,8
84 Sevastopol 14 333 17,5 -  
85 Republic of Crimea 14 221 25,4 18,2 7,2
Ranking
Return on assets of enterprises engaged in water gathering and distribution

Information agency Credinform prepared the ranking of enterprises engaged in water gathering and distribution.

The companies with the highest volume of revenue involved in water gathering and distribution were selected for the ranking according to the data from the Statistical Register for the latest available period (for the year 2013).

Return on assets (%) is the relation of the sum of net profit and interests payable to company’s total assets value. It shows how many monetary units of net profit were earned by each unit of total assets.

The ratio characterizes the efficiency of use by a company of its resources, the efficiency of company’s financial management.

That’s why the higher is the value of this indicator, the higher is the efficiency of business, i.e. the higher is the return on each monetary unit invested in assets. However, when drawing conclusions about financial standing of an enterprise it is necessary to consider two important points.

Firstly, comparison of companies on return on assets ratio can be correctly done only within one branch. For example, in branches with a high turnover of assets as retail trade this indicator will be significantly higher, as in industries, where asset turnover is traditionally low as in machine building industry.

Secondly, it is necessary to take into account the fact that the book value of assets may significantly not conform to their current market value. For example, under the influence of inflation the book value of fixed assets will be increasingly underestimated in the course of time, that will lead to overestimated return on assets. In other words, even within one branch an analyst should consider not only the structure, but also the age of assets.

The existing trend of this indicator also should be taken into account. Its consistent lowering points out the decline in efficiency of use of assets by business, and vice versa.

For getting of the most comprehensive and fair picture of the financial standing of an enterprise it is necessary to pay attention not only to average values of profit, but also to all presented combination of financial data.

Table 1. Revenues, return on assets and solvency index of the largest enterprises engaged in water gathering and distribution (TOP-10)
NameRegionRevenues, in mln RUB, for 2013Return on assets, %Solvency index GLOBAS-i®
1 Samarskie kommunalnye sistemy LLC
INN 6312110828
Samara region 3 608,9 13,09 258 high
2 «MUP Vodokanal Ekaterinburg
INN 6608001915
Sverlovsk region 5 671,4 8,36 178 the highest
3 «MUP g. Novosibirska GORVODOKANAL»
INN 5411100875
Novosibirsk region 4 184,8 2,68 162 the highest
4 «GUP Moskollektor
INN 7708000882
Moscow 5 288,9 2,53 189 the highest
5 NOVOGOR-Prikame LLC
INN 5902817382
Perm region 4 381,6 2,37 241 high
6 Nizhegorodsky vodokanal OJSC
INN 5257086827
Nizhnii Novgorod region 3 483,3 1,35 240 high
7 Rostovvodokanal OJSC
INN 6167081833
Rostov region 4 235,0 0,99 260 high
8  «GUP SKStavropolkraivodokanal
INN 2635040105
Stavropol territory 4 713,9 0,10 220 high
9 Mosvodokanal OJSC
INN 7701984274
Moscow 46 426,9 0,04 197 the highest
10 «MUP POVV g. Chelyabinsk»
INN 7421000440
Chelyabinsk region 3 226,0 0,02 220 high

The revenues of the largest Russian enterprises involved in water gathering and manufacture (TOP-10) according to the last published annual financial statement (for 2013) made 85,2 bln RUB, that is by 8,4% higher, than in the previous period.

enterprises engaged in water gathering and distribution

Picture. Return on assets and revenues of the largest enterprises engaged in manufacture and distribution of water (TOP-10)

The return on assets of all organizations of the TOP-10 is in the positive zone, that on its own is a good indicator for enterprises of housing and utility sector (the majority of companies have a negative ratio). In other words, the leaders finished the year with net profit.

The assets are the most effectively used by Samarskie kommunalnye sistemy LLC: return on its assets is 13,1%, that is well over, than the indicator of Mosvodokanal OJSC, Moscow (0,04%) – the production being largest on revenues. 

According to the independent estimation of the Information agency Credinform, all participants of the TOP-10 got high and the highest solvency index. This fact points to the ability of market players to pay off their debts in time and fully, while risk of default is minimal.