Article
Coal mining trends

The last UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) ended with the adoption of compromise documents. Previously, it was planned to fix the wording on the phase-out of energy obtained from coal. However, only a "phased reduction" is recorded in the final text. This indicates the impossibility of abandoning the use of coal as one of the main types of fuel and preserving the prospects of Russia as a global supplier of coal.

Coal mining industry of the country, experiencing difficulties associated with ensuring the safety of the work carried out, continues to develop.
Among the positive trends of the largest enterprises in the industry over the past 10 years, there has been an increase in the size of net assets and revenue, an increase in return on investment, and a continuing positive index of industrial production over the past 12 months.
Among the most significant negative trends: a high level of monopolization, instability of profit indicators and an increase in unprofitability, which leads to a decrease in the financial stability of enterprises.

To analyze activity trends in this area the Information agency Credinform using Globas selected the largest companies engaged in the extraction and enrichment of coal and anthracite (TOP 100) in terms of annual revenue for the last reporting periods available in the state statistics bodies and the Federal Tax Service (2015-2020).

Net assets is a ratio that reflects the real value of the company's property that is calculated annually as the difference between the assets on the company's balance sheet and its debt obligations. The net asset ratio is negative (insufficient property) if the company's debt exceeds the value of its property.

The largest company in the industry in terms of net assets is MEZHDURECHYE JSC, INN 4214000252, Kemerovo region - Kuzbass. In 2020, net assets amounted to more than 65 billion RUB.

The smallest size of net assets in the TOP 100 was owned by COAL COMPANY YUZHNAYA JSC, INN 4214021365, Kemerovo region - Kuzbass. The insufficiency of property in 2020 was expressed by a negative value of -69 billion RUB.

During the ten-year period, average industry indicators of net assets values and their growth rates tend to increase (Picture 1).

Picture 1. Change in average industry net assets ratios in 2011-2020 Picture 1. Change in average industry net assets ratios in 2011-2020

The shares of companies with insufficient assets in the TOP 100 have had a positive downward trend for five years. (Picture 2).

Picture 2. Shares of companies with negative net assets in the TOP 100 in 2016-2020. Picture 2. Shares of companies with negative net assets in the TOP 100 in 2016-2020.

Sales revenue
The revenue of the TOP 10 companies in 2020 amounted to 46% of the total revenue of the TOP 100 companies. (Picture 3). This indicates a high level of monopolization in the industry.

Picture 3. Shares of TOP-10 companies in the total revenue in 2020. TOP-100 Picture 3. Shares of TOP-10 companies in the total revenue in 2020. TOP-100

For ten years, the average industry indicators of revenue volumes have been increasing, and their growth rates have been decreasing year by year. (Picture 4).

Picture 4. Changes in average industry revenue ratios in 2011-2020 Picture 4. Changes in average industry revenue ratios in 2011-2020

Profit and loss
The largest company in the TOP 100 in terms of net profit in 2020 is JSC HOLDING COMPANY YAKUTUGOL, INN 1434026980, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). Their profit amounted to almost 38 billion RUB.

During the ten-year period, the indicators of average industry profit margins tend to increase, despite losses over four periods. (Picture 5).

Picture 5. Change in the average industry indicators of profit (loss) in 2012-2020. Picture 5. Change in the average industry indicators of profit (loss) in 2012-2020.

During the five-year period, the average industry values of net profit indicators are decreasing, and net loss is increasing (Picture 6).

Picture 6. Changes in average values of net profit and net loss indicators of TOP 100 companies in 2016-2020. Picture 6. Changes in average values of net profit and net loss indicators of TOP 100 companies in 2016-2020.

Key financial ratios
During the ten-year period, average industry indicators of the total liquidity ratio were mainly below the range of recommended values - from 1.0 to 2.0, with a downward trend. (Picture 7).

Сurrent liquidity ratio (current assets to short-term liabilities) shows sufficiency of a company’s assets to settle short-term liabilities.

Picture 7. Changes in current liquidity ratio average industry values in 2011-2020 Picture 7. Changes in current liquidity ratio average industry values in 2011-2020

For ten years, the average industry indicators of the return on investment ratio were at a relatively high level and showed an upward trend. (Picture 8).

This ratio is calculated as a ratio of net profit to amount of equity and long-term liabilities and demonstrates return on equity involved in commercial activities and long-term funds raised by organization.

Picture 8. Change in return on investment ratio average values in 2011-2020 Picture 8. Change in return on investment ratio average values in 2011-2020

Asset turnover ratio is calculated as ratio of sales revenue to average value of total assets for a period and implicates the efficiency of use of all available resources, regardless of the sources they were raised. The ratio shows how many times per year the full cycle of production and turnover is performed generating the corresponding effect in the form of profit.

During the ten-year period, average industry indicators of this business activity ratio tended to decrease (Picture9).

Picture 9. Change in asset turnover ratio average values in 2011-2020 Picture 9. Change in asset turnover ratio average values in 2011-2020

Small enterprises
Only 2% of the TOP 100 companies are registered in the Unified Register of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises of the Federal Tax Service of the Russian Federation. At the same time, the share of their revenue in the total volume of the TOP 100 companies in 2020 is only 0.32%, which is significantly lower than the national average in 2018 - 2019. (Picture 10).

Picture 10. Revenue share of small and medium-sized enterprises in the TOP 100 Picture 10. Revenue share of small and medium-sized enterprises in the TOP 100

Main regions of activity
The TOP 100 companies are registered in 17 regions (20% of the subjects of the Russian Federation) and are distributed unevenly across the country due to the geographical specifics of shipbuilding industry. Almost 64% of the total revenue of TOP 100 companies in 2020 are concentrated in the Kemerovo region - Kuzbass (Picture 11).

Picture 11. Distribution of TOP 100 companies' revenue by regions of Russia Picture 11. Distribution of TOP 100 companies' revenue by regions of Russia

Financial position score
Assessment of the of TOP 100 companies' financial position shows that the largest part of them is in an average financial position. (Picture 12).

Picture 12. Distribution of TOP 100 companies by financial position score Picture 12. Distribution of TOP 100 companies by financial position score

Globas Solvency Index
The largest part of the TOP 100 companies has been assigned a high Solvency Index by Globas. This indicates their ability to fully meet their debt obligations (Picture 13).

Picture 13. Distribution of TOP 100 companies according to the Globas Solvency Index Picture 13. Distribution of TOP 100 companies according to the Globas Solvency Index

Industrial Production Index
According to the Federal State Statistics Service, during the 12 months of 2020 - 2021, there is an increase in the index of industrial production in coal mining (Picture 14). At the same time, the calculated average index from month to month is 100.9%.

Picture 14. Industrial production index in coal mining in 2020 - 2021, month to month (%) Picture 14. Industrial production index in coal mining in 2020 - 2021, month to month (%)

Conclusion
Comprehensive assessment of the largest coal mining companies indicates the predominance of positive trends in their activities in the period from 2011 to 2020. (Table 1).

Table 1. Positive and negative trends, evaluation factors
Trends and evaluation factors Share of factor, %
Dynamics of average net assets value up10
Increase (decrease) rate in the average value of net assets up10
Increase / decrease in share of enterprises with negative values of net assets up10
Level of monopolization / competition down-10
Dynamics of average revenue up10
Growth (decline) rate in average value of revenue down-10
Dynamics of average profit (loss) up10
Increase / decline in average values of companies' net profit down-10
Increase / decline in average values of companies' net loss down-10
Increase / decrease in average values of overall liquidity ratio down-10
Increase / decrease in average values of return on investment ratio up10
Increase / decrease in average values of asset turnover ratio, times down-10
Share of small and medium-sized enterprises in revenue is more than 20% down-10
Regional concentration down-5
Financial position (the largest share) up5
Globas Solvency Index (the largest share) up10
The average index of industrial production for 12 months is more than 100% up10
Dynamics of the Industrial Production Index for 12 months. up10
Average value of factors share up1,1

вверх positive trend (factor), вниз negative trend (factor)

Article
Changes in legislation

Legal opinions of courts concerning record on unreliability of data, on closing of bankruptcy proceedings, on name with using the word «state» come to conclusions on justification of operations of the Federal Tax Service inspections on refusal of state registration or making an entry on termination of activity. However, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation considered illegal the striking-off of the garage cooperative as an inactive legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities (EGRUL).

In particular,

  • a conclusion on availability of arguments for refusal of state registration of the legal entity is considered correct by the court, when EGRUL contained a record on unreliability of data and reliable data wasn’t presented. It relates to the data on its management company, whose CEO acted as an applicant while registration;
  • law violations were not found, while making an entry on termination of activity based on a court decision on closing of bankruptcy proceedings;
  • the court determined that the name of company having the word «state», stated in the documents, presented for registration, doesn’t meet the requirements of the article 1473 of the Civil Code of Russia. This name may deceive the potential customers on content and quality of the offered services and relation of this company to government authorities.

At the same time, the Constitutional Court of Russia addressed the matters on the striking-off of the garage cooperative as an inactive legal entity from EGRUL.

The Resolution of the Constitutional Court of Russia as of 02.12.2021 №51-P declared that the inter-related provisions of paragraphs 1-4 of the article 21.1 and paragraph 7 of the article 22 of the Federal law «On State Registration of Legal Entities and Sole Entrepreneurs» do not correspond with the Constitution of Russia. According to the judicial interpretation, the mentioned regulations make it impossible to consider the specific features of this certain type of legal entity as citizen groups, intended to provide them with the possibility to use the property for the personal purposes without taking part in the civil transactions, carrying out non-profit activities and professional management of company. It happens when they are used in order to recognize garage construction co-operatives inactive and remove them from EGRUL just on the ground of such formal matters as absence of the bank account transactions and failure to present obligatory reports.

According to the Information and Analytical system Globas as of 14.12.2021, there are 335 garage construction co-operatives, in relation to which the decision about forthcoming striking-off of the inactive legal entity from the EGRUL was made. Totally, more than 4 thousand garage construction co-operatives have already been removed from EGRUL for this reason.