Article
Small and medium business in the Russian economy

For the first time, the Federal State Statistics Service published official statistical information on the share of small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) in the Russian economy. In 2017, it amounted to 21,9% of gross domestic product (GDP) or 20 trillion RUB.

Previously, such studies were carried out by the Non-Profit Partnership Association of Entrepreneurial Organizations «OPORA», uniting over 100 business and industry associations. In 2015, according to these calculations, the share of SMEs in GDP was 20%, with the number of employees exceeding 17 million people.

Information on small business is also contained in the Unified Register of small and medium-sized businesses. 6 058 279 SMEs with 15 843 300 employees are registered in the Register as of February 10, 2019.

The Unified Register of small and medium-sized businesses was established in accordance with the Federal Law of 29.12.2015 No. 408-FL and is formed by the Federal Tax Service on the basis of:

  • Unified State Register of Legal Entities (EGRUL);
  • Unified State Register of Individual Entrepreneurs (EGRIP);
  • data presented in accordance with the tax legislation of the Russian Federation on the average number of employees and income from business activities;
  • data contained in documents related to the application of special tax regimes;
  • data provided by legal entities and individual entrepreneurs.

Comprehensive data on SMEs and their business is available by subscription to the Information and Analytical system Globas

Ranking
Debt to assets ratio of small wholesale companies

Information agency Credinform has prepared a ranking of Russian small companies in wholesale trade. Russian small companies that are wholesalers and are included in the Register of small and medium-sized enterprises of the Federal Tax Service, and have the largest annual revenue (TOP-10) were selected for the ranking, according to the data from the Statistical Register for the latest available accounting periods (2015 - 2017). Then they were ranked by debt to assets ratio (Table 1). The analysis was based on the data from the Information and Analytical system Globas.

Debt to assets ratio indicates the share of the company’s assets being financed by loans. Normal value of the ratio is from 0.2 to 0.5.

Sales revenue and net profit demonstrate a company’s size and its business efficiency, and debt to solvency ratio indicates the risk of insolvency. It is particularly important to consider the structure of liabilities: both current and non-current. Long-term projects are not to be financed by short-term loans that are due less than in 12 months. Unforeseen conditions may have a great impact on a company’s solvency.

In 2017, almost two-thirds of the companies had a debt to assets ratio that is above the average industry one. It characterizes the wholesale industry as a one that is more dependent on external funds.

The indicators and financial ratios under consideration, as well as their change, are to be considered to get a full and comprehensive vision of the financial standing of the sector companies. See the TOP-10 companies ranking below (Table 1).

Table 1. Revenue, net profit, debt to assets ratio, solvency index Globas of the largest Russian small wholesale companies (TOP-10)
Name, INN, region Sales revenue, billion RUB Net profit (loss), million RUB Debt to assets ratio Solvency index Globas
2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
SIBSULPHUR CO.,LTD.
INN 2466127447
Krasnoyarsk territory
up2,95 up2,97 down207,0 down173,6 down0,74 up0,52 236 Strong
ORIMI TRADE LIMITED
INN 7804069580
Leningrad region
up44,92 down38,86 down3604 up8242 up0,69 up0,65 196 Наивысший
EAST TRADE LLC
INN 3802011429
Irkutsk region
down4,76 up5,19 up17,6 up30,0 down0,78 down0,80 252 Medium
TRADE HOUSE AGRO-LINE LLC
INN 4706015503
Saint Petersburg
down8,46 down6,40 up24,7 up86,3 up0,93 up0,89 201 Strong
PRODUCT MOSAIC LLC
INN 6319152954
Samara region
up2,13 up2,18 up13,4 down5,1 up0,88 down0,92 246 Strong
AGROALYANS LLC
INN 6319712412
Samara region
up2,16 up2,28 up19,0 down7,3 down0,88 down0,94 267 Medium
TRADE HOUSE GLOBAL MARKET LLC
INN 9721073146
Moscow
up4,73 up6,31 up31,3 up82,5 up0,97 up0,96 291 Medium
CHEESE MASTER LLC
INN 6319179280
Samara region
up1,40 up3,40 up6,3 up6,7 down0,94 down0,96 275 Medium
VELES GROUP LLC
INN 7730550987
Moscow
down4,78 down3,86 down5,9 up6,4 up0,95 down0,97 249 Strong
FORDA LLC
INN 7814720226
Saint Petersburg
down2,20 up2,33 down2,2 up4,7 down0,979 up0,976 257 Medium
Total for TOP-10 companies up78,50 down73,80 up3931 up8645    
Average value for TOP-10 companies up7,85 down7,38 down393 up864 down0,87 up0,86
Industry average value up0,122 up0,125 up4 down2 up0,73 up0,73

Up — improvement compared to prior period, Up — decline compared to prior period.

In 2017 seven of TOP-10 companies improved their sales revenue, and seven companies had a higher net profit. Average sales revenue of TOP-10 companies declined, and debt to assets ratio stayed the same.

Picture 1. Debt to assets ratio and revenue of the largest Russian small wholesale companies (TOP-10) Picture 1. Debt to assets ratio and revenue of the largest Russian small wholesale companies (TOP-10)

In 2017 43% of total industry revenue belonged to the companies from the Central Federal District (Picture 2). Moscow and St. Petersburg have 26.2 and 11.4% of total revenue respectively. Moscow is also leading at assets and liabilities volume that are 29.6 and 28.9% respectively. TOP-5 regions by revenue of small companies in wholesale trade are Moscow, St. Petersburg, Moscow region, Leningrad region and Novosibirsk region. The same is regarding debt to assets ratio. This indicates that central regions of Russia are attractive for small businesses.

Picture 2. Regions by their share in total revenue of 2017 Picture 2. Regions by their share in total revenue of 2017

During the decade average debt to assets ratio clearly tends to grow (Picture 3). The growth peaked in 2014. The last 3 years showed a gradual decline in debt to assets ratio. In general, the sector needs time to get to the same level as 8 years ago.

Picture 3. Change of average industry values of debt to assets ratio in 2008 – 2017 Picture 3. Change of average industry values of debt to assets ratio in 2008 – 2017